I'm sorry if it sounded OT, the title triggered my comment, and I think my point stands on that. With all respect to the contents of the article.
SuluBeddu
"Don't you have time for our lord and saviour?"
"I still haven't finished reading the Times, I'll drop by them when I'm done"
"Yes, Vance thinks" is the news here
Exactly, you need a specific setup to enjoy it, and you need to give it focus!
I don't think that making content specifically to be liked by people who wouldn't enjoy the typical style is a good concept... It can be explored sure, but they also need to make sure to make new trak-like content too
But again I really need to see discovery and snw to see how things are going right now. I also don't want to judge the s31 movie before watching it
My personal experience is that one should be ready to watch star trek.
When I was 20 I simply wasn't ready and didn't try watching any of it despite a friend insisting it was worth it.
Two years ago, instead, I was so ready that I could enjoy TOS too
I'm still not at discovery, so I need to see the nuTrek to say more. But I really just think you can't advertise trek too much.
Sono proprio shockato /s
La speranza è che la riposta dal basso venga ascoltata
Però più tempo passa con questo exploit delle estreme destre, più le altre forze politiche saranno tentate e gli elettorati accetteranno. Certo il CDU ha un prestigio, che sta mettendo a rischio...
Look, I understand it can come off as pretentious. Perhaps it is
But let's frame this a second.
AI, as I'm sure you are all aware, is a very old concept with useful applications dating back in the 80s. Not "the future is bright", but "this is a useful tool that is already helping in many fields".
Then one day, in the last 5 years, monopolists start doing generative AI to offer a flashy useless and wasteful service.
We then start calling this specific abuse of the technology, and of tens of years of passionate research, like the technology itself, overshadowing the rest.
If you think there's nothing wrong with that, I understand why my comment is unwanted. I think that it's wrong, a generalisation we wouldn't accept in other fields. I will refrain from making examples as I don't want to sound even more pretentious.
I guess I made my stand, I'll refrain coming back to this post at this point.