Stumblinbear

joined 2 years ago
[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

That's not what plagiarism means. At the very worst it could be a copyright violation, but they're not really distributing someone else's work without permission. Licensing issue? Possibly

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Depends on the state if it's required. Not required in Kansas, but required in Minnesota as an example

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago

I know? I wasn't disagreeing with you

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Depends on if you think essentially wiretapping someone's house is illegal

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

NDAs are null and void for illegal activity

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Truly remarkable. A paragon of the written word.

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 0 points 2 years ago

What a fascinating and insightful reply

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago

I see the exact opposite. I've never seen it in a context other than shutting down a discussion before it can be had.

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And yours wasn't? Man, the least you could be is self aware

view more: ‹ prev next ›