StoneyPicton

joined 5 months ago
[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Why is Canada letting dipshit pick and choose which industries he protects for political reasons. Canada should switch from the tariff method and put an export tax on everything.

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Thanks. I wasn't aware of the specific mechanism in our trade agreements. No government should be compromising their right to make public policy.

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Although I think the volatility of sourcing is probably not a factor in most business (I'm not just talking food), I agree as with everything there would be details to work out. A reasonable exception with regard to information on packaging could be accommodated with a posting on their website. This whole packaging issue has recently been exposed as BS given how quickly and efficiently company's recently changed packaging and labeling in order to deceive their customers. From my perspective I've had enough of corporate crybabies. Thanks for your thoughts and example.

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Thank you for adding more substance to my rant. Is the reason for a private business not to disclose the origin of their inputs exactly that by not doing so it deprives me of my right to express my beliefs? Obviously any existing laws or regulations are exactly where I am trying to force change. I don't agree with the protections offered under trade secrets as I am only suggesting they are forced to add a list of countries and only a percentage of the inputs they represent. In addition I'm already tired of corporations hiding too much under the "trade secret" banner. In general I have not been a fan of corporate governance for some time and feel it is time to bring them to heal. I know this opens up a whole can of worms but I would argue it to the end. Thanks again for your thoughts.

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

You said it fellow human, lol.

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm a lazy, not so bright contrarian who doesn't know the details enough to have formed a sensible defense. What I do know is that I have a right to express my beliefs through my patronage and I'm currently being inhibited in that effort by the intentional obfuscation of the information I need.

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I understand the many inputs that are involved but if you take the accounting side of things it would take nothing to identify a % for each country involved. The difficulty you suggest sounds more like a marketing complaint. Company's have all been only to quick lately to demonstrate how convenient it is to change their packaging.

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago (8 children)

For years I've been thinking about forcing a change to the Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act mentioned here by issuing a charter challenge. My stance would be that not forcing company's to list all countries of origin and the percentage of material and labour that they make up denies me the information I need to make an informed decision. I have a right to this information so that I can express my support for or against areas of influence that affect my life. Anybody think this would work?

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

I'm late to the game so I'll probably skip that step.

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 43 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Another big winner here is China. I would love to know the contents of that meeting between putin and xi, I think back in 2022(?)

[–] StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

When you wake up in the morning and no ones there, do you rejoice or do you despair. When you bump your head on the end of your bed, does anybody care. Will you end your life with no friend or wife, who will be witness to bare. In that case for you, the solitude true, and the judgement would be that its fair.

view more: ‹ prev next ›