Spzi

joined 2 years ago
[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 2 points 2 years ago

I had a very short and consistent scheme for a while. No text, just icons.

{materiel icon}{chest icon}

For example, one station provides iron plates to the rail network (loads onto train), the other requests crude oil from the rail network (unloads from train):

Downsides: Some uncommon icons can be hard to read. Some liquids are similar in color and hard to identify when seen alone.


So later we changed to a better readable format. Examples:

[L] Iron Plates

[U] Crude Oil

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 1 points 2 years ago

A mall can also help you to resupply several items in one location.

Once you get bots, the game changes dramatically. After that point, I play more from map view than actually walking around.

And after all, you play the game, don't let the game play you ;)

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 2 points 2 years ago

Legalize it 🥦

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 2 points 2 years ago

Link zur Petition: https://weact.campact.de/petitions/kohleausstieg-im-osten-wir-junge-menschen-in-der-lausitz-brauchen-zukunft


https://fridaysforfuture.de/kohleausstieg-ost/

Am 25.06. demonstrieren wir direkt an der Abbruchkante am Tagebau Welzow in der Lausitz! Gemeinsam mit einem breiten Bündnis gehen wir alle gemeinsam auf die Straße und fordern einen 1,5 Grad-kompatiblen Kohleausstieg und sozial gerechten Strukturwandel! Es braucht faire Lösungen für die Arbeitskräfte in den Kohlekraftwerken und echte Angebote und Chancen für junge Menschen in der Lausitz.

  • Wann? 25.06. – Beginn 12 Uhr
  • Wo? Tagebau Welzow, Treffpunkt am Schaufelrad
  • Shuttles ab 11 Uhr vom Bf Neupetershain

https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/gesellschaft/strukturwandel-brandenburg-100.html

Streit gibt es um das Jahr, in dem die Braunkohleverstromung beendet werden soll, das sorgt für Verunsicherung in der Region. Vereinbart ist bis spätestens 2038. Die Grünen streben an, den Ausstieg auch in den ostdeutschen Braunkohleländern Brandenburg, Sachsen und Sachsen-Anhalt auf 2030 vorzuziehen. Das hat ihre Bundestagsfraktion im Frühjahr auf einer Klausurtagung beschlossen als wichtigen Schritt für den Klimaschutz. In Nordrhein-Westfalen haben Landesregierung, Bundeswirtschaftsministerium und der Energiekonzern RWE bereits einen Schritt in diese Richtung getan.

Im Osten halten die Ministerpräsidenten der betroffenen Länder bislang an 2038 als Ausstiegsdatum fest. Zu viele Fragen seien zum Beispiel in der Lausitz noch ungeklärt, etwa was die Sicherung der Stromversorgung ohne die Kohle angeht, wer am Ende die jahrzehntelang anfallenden Folgekosten für die Tagebausanierung trägt und wie die Lausitz künftig mit Wasser versorgt werden soll.

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 1 points 2 years ago

part of why it’s confusing is that we don’t have defined names for these things.

But we do: Communities.

You find that term in the UI, in user documentation, and the /c/ part of the URL also refers to that.

Calling it anything else, especially unrelated to /c/, will only make it harder and more confusing for new people to join.

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 1 points 2 years ago

If a community already exists on another instance, as an instance owner you should subscribe to that community rather than making your own. That increases resilience.

How does that increase resilience? I would say the opposite increases resilience, multiple communities for the same topic on different instances. Putting all your eggs in one basket is not resilient, it puts everyone on the whim of the admins of that instance.

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 1 points 2 years ago

I don’t care about how beehive views Lemmy world as I can access still both as I am from an entirely different instance :)

It impacts you still if you subscribe to beehaw.org communities. Their defederation means lots of other users cannot participate in these communities anymore. So there is less activity for you, even if you belong to neither the defederating nor the defederated instance.

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 3 points 2 years ago

That's fine, they can try? Just as anyone else can have different goals and pursue them.

I really like this openness of the fediverse in arguments like these. We don't have to agree, it's alright.

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Oh, good point. Yes, probably? We can not simply assume search engines know that all of these point to the same content:

Or even worse, due to defederation, they may not all point to the exact same content.

Without further investment either from lemmy or the search engine's side, they are probably seen as distinct sources, not aggregated. Which makes each individually less relevant and less likely to show up .

Also note none of the adresses above contain 'lemmy'. How would users search for content on lemmy in these cases? Can't do "technology site:lemmy", or?

But I can say, lemmy content is visible. Haven't seen it on the first page of ecosia yet, but on page 2 or 3.

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 2 points 2 years ago

I found pretty much everything by now. But I'm still missing:

  • DebateReligion
  • AskScience

And of course some activity in niche communities, but that will come.

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 3 points 2 years ago

AskScience

Miss that :(

I could just go there, see a seemingly stupid question and be amazed by the professionality and detail of the comment section. A bit like XKCD - what if? on endless mode.

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 4 points 2 years ago

If that same human community subscribes to all of the different tech communities on different instances, then they’ll all still be interacting together online, all commenting on the same tech posts. No fragmentation.

Yes, if. That assumes they all searched for (or even !discovered) all the distributed communities. This would be visible as all communities having the exact same subscriber count.

In practice, most users will only subscribe to one or two communities, and subscriber counts will vary wildly. In practice, there is fragmentation (though that's neither necessarily a bad thing nor is it meaningfully different from reddit).

Imagine a mod of r/technology went on a power trip? Now the whole sub is gone. Imagine the mod of technology.beehaw went crazy? Not a big deal. Everyome unsubscribes from that community and the discussion carries on in the different tech communities. Or what if beehaw goes down for an hour? (Or forever?) Also not a big deal (unless your account is on beehsw!) because the rest of the instances will still be up.

That's an important point and very relevant in the context of the migration from reddit (which would not have happened if spez had only power over one or some instances, not all), and the context of the recent defederation event.

I got the feeling we as a lemmy community should want our communities to be fragmented across many instances. Not sure if more than a handful gives any further advantages, but having only one significant community on one particular instance makes the whole of lemmy very dependent on the administration of that instance.

I expect we will see a feature soon(ish) to set up a multireddit-equivalent so you can just pull up the tech communities you’re subbed to.

That would be great! I also hope search and discovery will be improved.

view more: ‹ prev next ›