Sphere

joined 5 years ago
[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago (10 children)

lmao an R160 managed to kill 500 people when one has literally never managed to even kill 10 before? Come on. You're not even subjecting these claims to basic common sense.

PS: It was likely an antipersonnel munition, and it burst in the air; the tiles are irrelevant, you credulous fool.

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Pretty sure no one is actually bringing up oxygen tanks except my dumb ass (and that only as a way to say, even if we afford maximum benefit of the doubt here, the Israeli lies still fall totally flat). But you're otherwise totally correct.

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If you're responding to my comment, probably nothing; it's just the only thing I could think of that a hospital would likely have in it, that could increase the power of an explosive device. I haven't been following the story all that closely tbh.

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago (12 children)

lmao kindly name the type of military hardware Hamas has that could have caused that explosion. I'll wait.

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Ok so this is surely a deeply cold take and an entirely unoriginal thought by this point, but is it even remotely conceivable that Hamas has (or had) military hardware capable of destroying that hospital? Like even if a rocket hit a whole bunch of oxygen tanks, I can't see the resulting explosion killing more than 100 people at the absolute worst.

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It means the slur filter is picking up something in the link. Just say the what missing characters are without putting them together.

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago

The abstract even says, "The result is discussed in the context of living conditions in Gaza."

(and it sure seems to me that one might explore the consanguinity profile of Gaza if one were concerned about the negative effects on the population trapped there, but hey, what do I know?)

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 67 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Ok you asked, so I'll answer. A trans woman is a woman, full stop. A lesbian woman is a woman who is only interested in fellow women. There is no contradiction there whatsoever, and it's actually a form of transphobia to think that there is. Most of us have learned transphobia from the society around us, so it's important to recognize it and stamp it out when it crops up.

Also, people's identities are important; trying to ignore them is a form of retreat used by reactionaries to avoid having to grow socially.

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 24 points 2 years ago

Enjoy paying through the nose for heat this winter, you propagandized fool.

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago

Children of the future will demand to know our excuses for the lack of terror

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Doesn't SAG need to reach a deal too before the production of slop can resume?

Edit: Ah ok, the article mentions that resolution for SAG is expected pretty soon too now. So, lots to potentially celebrate here, assuming the terms are as good as the negotiating team seems to think.

view more: ‹ prev next ›