SpaceScotsman

I've only watched the first episode, I don't know if I'll watch the rest. I think I've hit on the key problem that this episode has: Interesting ideas, that it just doesn't do anything interesting with. There are three key areas the episode could have focused on:

• Translation. You have to be incredibly arrogant to assume you could instantly translate a language you've never spoken before. We get some hints of this but they never lead anywhere because the whole scene is cut off by the emergency alert and the cut to the news montage. The mistranslation we briefly see never has a chance to set in with any major down-the-line consequences. Even the reference to misgendering is a throwaway because there was never any danger of it leading to offence, and it comes across virtue signally more than having meaning. And I am very confused why the scene is directed as if this is the first time they've shared a dialogue, when there is loads of dialogue, equipment, and prior process to suggest they've already done this before.
• Diplomacy. Similar to translation, we never get a chance for any misunderstandings, cultural shocks, subterfuge, political bargaining. We get a generic british diplomat who has to leave before we even get a chance to know him and his mindset. We get some obvious low hanging fruit about pollution, but without any serious discussion. I suspect this may come in later episodes, but this first one fails to make a big impression on this.
• Gerry Anderson rube goldberg machines. The big tank forms a huge set piece. We get a very quick tease of a disaster scene, but it doesn't lead anywhere. It fails to grip me with drama because there's a sudden fear things are going to go wrong, only for the problem to immediately resolve without UNIT's intervention itself when unnamed scaffold worker #3 tightens a bolt and fixes everything. If they wanted to play this up, they failed.

Other gripes:

• It starts with a dodgy CGI jumpscare, the soil liquefaction scene was honestly more terrifying, as something that can actually really happen in certain circumstances like earthquakes, but that only takes place about 10 minutes in. The liquefaction murder would have been a far more terrifying cold open that jumping in to a fishing boat monster. The story is being told from Barclay's perspective, so I don't think we should have seen any of the monster until the first time Barclay sees it in person.
• The voices of many of the cast were far to mumbly, I needed subtitles early on. No nonsense army captain has a particularly low monotone voice.
• The reference to the doctor didn't need to be there, it didn't contribute to the plot in any way. A spinoff needs to be able to stand on its own two feet. We already have UNIT, Kate, etc as the "hand over" characters, and I didn't even see the whoniverse logo at the start, so I don't know what the ultimate goal is there.
• Another admin security failure from UNIT. They keep doing this. They're supposed to be the toughest top level security force on the planet, and they can't get a basic HR form right. I can suspend my disbelief for sea monsters and instant translation tech, but 'I'm here by accident' is just to much. The hand wavy "ah, but you're the civilian we need here" doesn't fix it.
• Various minor writing issues. They "put the body far away from the village"? It's literally in one of the houses next door. "I'm here by accident", to which army guy immediately replies "So you're saying you're here by accident". Why the deck chairs just to watch a loudspeaker blast some sound waves? Why is a helicopter carrying steel beams across london?

are you complaining that smaller devs get a bigger cut than larger devs? That's certainly an interesting gripe...

Smaller devs have to pay 30% of their revenues to steam. If a game sells well enough, their revenue share increases and steam takes a smaller cut, 25 or even 20%. This greatly benefits publishers of big games and unfairly punishes smaller developers. I think that's a perfectly fair gripe.

Forgot about steam's forced DRM on purchases. Forgot about their inconsistent policing of content in games they sell. Forgot about steam not wanting accounts to be inherited when you pass away. Forgot about their 30% cut for small devs while bigger devs get a smaller cut. Forgot about a lot of things.

Sugars and additives are in nearly all foods, maybe we should stop asking manufacturers to disclose it on the ingredients list.

Going purely by the illustration, pass it to the next person because they have a track with no-one on it

The War Between The Land And The Sea comes to BBC One and iPlayer from 7 December, and Disney+ in 2026.

For a "very 2025" show, I see they're keeping up the age old tradition of delaying international release for no good reason. I don't care, I'm in the UK, but just... why?

A website generator built by a human still gave a human the chance to make some choices, feel useful, validate it worked right, possibly even an income.

This is just RTD being RTD, and I should ignore it. But it sent me on a wikipedia rabbit hole,

If we're being pendantic that wouldn't be "racist", it would be "speciesist",as race in biology refers to subspecies differences, not species-level, which is what the aqua/sapiens distinction means.

Also, if we're being inclusive implying that homo aqua are not "sapient", i.e. intelligent, seems about as insulting as calling them devils.

Totally unrelated, but I learned that from the latin genus name, you can refer to the chimpanzee tribe as "Panini", which is fun.

it took me far too long to parse this sentence. I kept trying to figure out why the grandparents calling their grandson on the phone was relevant to the story

If there are no dangerous predators, then there is no problem voting third party

I take issue with this comment from the article:

A Doctor Who source says the show suffered because Gatwa never fully embraced the role. “There is more to that role than performing,” this person says. “You have got to be an ambassador for the brand and embrace being that generation’s Doctor. Matt Smith and David Tennant fully understood the responsibility it carried.”

What nonsense. An actors job is to act, and Gatwa acted well. He had gravitas, he had presence, he was entertaining to watch. And much like with Eccleston's run (who was there even less time than Gatwa by the way), the problems I saw had nothing to do with an actor failing to be a "brand ambassador". If there are problems with branding, that's the broadcast executive team's fault, not the cast and crew.

I first read this as MPEG and thought they were talking about the video encoding.

I wish they were talking about the video encoding.