also explicitly meant as rationalist esoterica.
Always a bad sign when people can't just let a thing be a thing just for enjoyment, but see everything as the 'hustle' (for lack of a better word). I'm reminded of that dating profile we looked at which showed that 99% what he did was related to AI and AI doomerism, even the parties.
That opening has a strong 'omg what the fuck happened there, and why are you still friends with these people if it is that bad' vibes.
Lot of people told me they were mad, but I got the vibe it was complicated. lol what...
Wrong, it is beer.
I agree with him there. But hard to make arguments against something which doesn't exist. ;)
Love how we went from 'you need to learn rationality, and be aware of your biasses' to you need to have virtue. And ignore the screaming in the backgrounds, that is just the academics who studied ethics doing their normal thing again.
Anyway the rest gets pretty dark pretty quickly, and I just see red flags (for people who believe in data this devolves very quickly in just going 'people are prob better off due to this, the new trauma doesn't count because of preexisting conditions, consent and trauma always happening'). And this was the article they wrote not wanting to harm the project.
Wait one more remark:
Hahahaha, perfect.
It also reminds me of the interview with Metz where they got mad Metz used religious terms. (you know, last week).