I assume these 'ai debuggers' are for looking inside the AI black box when they AI goes 'yes I'm very sorry I will not do it again' before doing it again.
Soyweiser
joined 2 years ago
I appreciate it, and this also gives us an easy way to discuss it as Zitron seems to be quite popular here. So makes sense to me to just also post it here. And not everybody uses RSS (or Eds one).
What the hell does that even mean, lmao?
Feel like people are just reaching for things 'clearly we need tools to help us with the process, so lets just call them debuggers for AI'
You can't talk to us like that, we are not the biassed masses, we are unbiased!
Finally a page Trump can read. (that font size damn...)
It never is is it. It never is.
Via, prob posted here already "Stack Overflow data reveals the hidden productivity tax of ‘almost right’ AI code", as the article is a month old.
It is gonna be worse, they can back up their statements by referring to people who were actually there, but they person they then would be referring to is Tim Pool, and you can't as an first principles intellectual of the order of LessWrong, reveal that actually you get your information from disgraced yt'ers like all the other rightwing plebs. It has to remain an unspoken secret.
You called them racist without proving from first principles it is bad to be racist, that they are racist, and their specific form of racism is also bad and will not lead to better outcomes in than being non-racist in the megafuture.
Well, the first thing I thought about was also the flag (but more because people brought it up a while back), and TIL about the SCP foundation (despite me talking about 4chan from time to time I never have been a channer, I have only very rarely posted some stuff in the roguelikes topic, and left when people let the neo-nazis in who kept calling people who asked a bit of money for a roguelike jews. Just sucks they never heard of the nazi bar stuff.
https://archive.is/PDgTJ this one seems to work. "The world should prepare for the looming quantum era: New breakthroughs underscore the technology’s potential and perils"
The headline jumps into the critihype already. (which might be justified by the article, im just judging the book by the cover)
From the other reactions, dont have the energy to read it atm (it was this or orcas), looks like he is recreating heartiste from first principles.