Always a good sign when people call normal security concerns that. Hackers love that. /s
Soyweiser
joined 2 years ago
What a fool. A proper scientist would test for a bigger N. Drop your phone in the pool again Why.
So the water usage of data centers/ai has long been controversial (either a huge issue/a non issue/distraction depending on who you ask) and the lack of real numbers around it made it hard to know more (but data center owners keeping it a secret made it sus). But now the stats of one google data center have been released due to legal pressure. 2-8 million gallons a day
Sorry, I was referring to a part of the Prince of Darkness movie
Words on computer screen: "You will not be saved by the holy ghost. You will not be saved by the god Plutonium. In fact, YOU WILL NOT BE SAVED!"
As that movie has people sending messages back from the future using dreams plot element.
The god Plutonium will save me.
It is amazing in a way, as in .nl our anti piracy org (brein) already went after local AI models for copyright infringement. While people in power still think we should go all in on AI. Sadly people with tech skills are rare in gov (politicians who go after the votes of tech enthousiasts otoh).
Military planners in Taiwan, SK and Japan are prob shitting bricks right now.
Wonder how hard it was to filter out the HOI4 results.
It wasnt just one like almost all of them were bad. The worst one was a vid where they went 'they did great things with colors, see how the rebels constantly wear yellow and red clothing to symbolize the fire of the rebellion' only half the outfits they called orange were just brown, and their supporting arguments on this from things which were said clearly were about other thematicnthings which they missed.
I purged them from my history to try and make the algo stop however.
Unrelated to that, also saw a guy do a deep dive on the themes of a movie (not andor). Only to admit he had only seen the movie once. Which is quite a thing to admit.
Considering the war with Iran (and how some people will just blame anything that goes wrong on AI), this is quite the PR mastermove from Altman.
There cant be a bank run if there is no bank.
Wonder what would have happened if they had not stopped after 31 tries. Sure it gave a goodish answer once, but was that just a luck of the draw? A proper evaluation imho shouldnt stop when you get a good answer once, esp as bad results tend to not get published. (Also, as always somebody might have found the answer already online).
It is also silly in some ways as I wonder how hard it is for people to evaluate the 31 results and not get stuck in pursuing an earlier false lead.