I have been watching this case for a little while and it looks like the most likely one to show how much power the judicial branch has under this administration.
I would wager the answer is "none", but we won't know for sure until it happens.
SoupBrick
joined 1 year ago
That is clever.
Hmm, looks like it has been used by a variety of people for a while. This is what I could find, but if you have a better source for that claim, I am open to correction.
Missing an IPad with one of those anti-drop cases. He needs something to do while daddy is talking.
Won't someone think of the billionaires? 🥺
I appreciate this post, really helps me fill out my block list. It is sad that people cannot just let others live as they want.
Trump accused of using taxpayer funds to 'Uber' Musk and his son X on Marine One: 'WTF is going on?'
I would bet against that. Rules for thee, but not for me.
Are they being ruined in the courts? I haven't seen any recent updates on this situation, but so far I am tracking that the admin has basically ignored the unfreeze ruling.
Due to similarities, both cases were assigned to U.S. District Judge Amir H. Ali, who issued a temporary restraining order against the USAID funding freeze on Feb. 13. Despite that order, the Trump administration, in a Feb. 18 filing, admitted it had circumvented the court’s order.
Here is a more recent article on this: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/i-cant-get-a-straight-answer-from-you-judge-loses-patience-with-trump-admin-lawyer-for-repeatedly-ignoring-court-order-unfreezing-usaid-funds-issues-harsh-evidentiary-demands/
Trump said there will be pain before America is "great again". So, expect any news like this to be ignored by the party of "fiscal responsiblility".
<3