He loved houses. Houses is one letter off from horses. A stallion is a horse. His password is stallion!
I also only pirate games I own, though for slightly different reasons. I don't think you should pay for everything you get value from (I don't [directly] pay people back for gifts, for example,) but I do think it's theft to pirate a game you never bought. Plus, buying games is how you support the developers.
data itself has no value
Programming: the art of creating worthless things and still getting paid for it.
Real talk, though, surely you're not the worst he's seen.
I remember thinking I was a hero when a CRT monitor was falling towards me and I caught it.
Ah, there it is, and that actually helps to answer the question. Assuming the Biblical God, canon states that God is love. So why would a perfect God, who is love, create a universe? It seems most likely to me that it would be so He can have an object of His love.
But what is love directed to something perfect and easy to love? That's hardly a worthy effort. Might as well make something authentic. And since He isn't just loving, but love itself, He might as well make it in such a way that He can carry out every aspect of love - love when they love you back, love when they turn away, love when they hate you, love when they don't even think you exist, and so much more.
The universe must be filled with evil for half these situations to appear, but it's not love to make someone evil. The solution? Free will. God made it so His creations were free to turn their backs on Him, but still, in love, He gave every warning against it, because separation from God is not only evil but death.
Indeed. May thy burgers be healed.
Or brown. Did the Human Torch do this?
But the ✨art✨!
I only skimmed it, but I did read through the satire article. So I just read through the one linked here, and I don't see where you're getting that from. The tiktok doesn't say it's satire in the video either. I don't use tiktok, but from what I can see, the account description doesn't appear when you're just watching the video.
I've never heard of this, but my guess is some people shared the headline and people reacted to that without clicking on the link, and even if they did click on the link, they didn't tab into the about page or read the "please subscribe" bit at the end, which are the only places it says it's satire if you're going in from a link. Other than that, it just reads like a sarcastic conservative-leaning writer talking about real plans.
Of course that'd never happen over here, right? You'd never react to a headline without reading the article, right guys? And even if you did, you'd at least tab into the about page to check if it's satire, right? Right? . . . guys?
Even if you take a picture of a blurry picture of the moon... curious.