Sotuanduso

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Other than the time being 7 AM, I'm generally that first bird. I try to make sure that everyone is on board with what we go with. I will ask the owl, and if it doesn't work for them, I'll check with the others for a better time. There is no being overruled before you can even speak up.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I'll allow it.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you... do you yawn when you think too hard?

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Quick googling shows that in 2021, agriculture produced 10.9 billion tons of emissions, while fossil fuels produced 36.8. There might be some overlap between the two, but I'm assuming not for ease of math.

The way I see it, doing both would be nice, but if we try that, fossil fuel companies and bacon enjoyers are going to end up on the same team, and that's going to be very difficult to fight. The corporations can easily push propaganda like "Fight this legislation, they want you to eat bugs and tofu instead of real meat for your Fourth of July barbecue," and then nothing gets done.

On the other hand, if we target fossil fuels first, we may be able to cut 77%, and by doing so we overcome the "it's too late, there's nothing we can do about it" mindset, and no longer have fossil fuel industries trying to fight us when we target agriculture next. Plus, getting people to drop meat keeps getting easier as meat alternatives get better.

We've got to strategize. Targeting both at once may be the only way we can hit the target, but it's so much less likely. I'd rather stop emissions after missing the target than fail to stop them at all.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I'd rather switch the datacenters to green energy before trying to convince people to give up cheeseburgers.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

There's no need to make someone feel dumber for a simple mixup.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

Huh, I guess I should have googled it first. I just assumed that blue would oppose it because fptp keeps them in power too.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Voting blue isn't going to get us any closer to ranked voting either.

EDIT: Skill issue. I made an assumption.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know the joke is that it's just a bunch of tropes, but if you just change the names to be less lampshady, this looks like it could be a good campaign map.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Something I learned fairly early in German class.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I thought it was Cinnamon Toast Crunch, but that makes a lot more sense.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Du
Du hast
Du hast es
Du hast es gemacht

view more: ‹ prev next ›