Solemn

I didn't realize just how siloed my perspective may be haha, I appreciate the statistics. I'll agree that cyber security is a concern in general, and honestly everyone I know in industry has at least a moderate knowledge of basic cyber security concepts. Even in embedded, processes are evolving for safety critical code.

I went through this a little bit myself. My car has absolutely no utility whatsoever, which makes it a bit awkward as I get into woodworking and other physical hobbies. But the reality is, it costs me less than $100 including gas to rent a uhaul for a day. It's a bit inconvenient that I can't go buy stuff on a whim, but with a little bit of planning it's ridiculously cheaper for me to just rent a uhaul every once in a while rather than buy a new car.

... But we do? When deciding whether to go for lunch, everyone I know very much will say, "Do you want Mexican, Thai, American,..." and so on.

Oh yeah. I wasn't sure how to get across that I wasn't talking about that as a Texas exclusive thing. It's everywhere in the US.

Edit: Texas is the only place I've seen someone go on an angry christofascist tirade in my suburban grocery store though.

... You know not all development is Internet connected right? I'm in embedded, so maybe it's a bit of a siloed perspective, but most of our programs aren't exposed to any realistic attack surfaces. Even with IoT stuff, it's not like you need to harden your motor drivers or sensor drivers. The parts that are exposed to the network or other surfaces do need to be hardened, but I'd say 90+% of the people I've worked with have never had to worry about that.

Caveat on my own example, motor drivers should not allow self damaging behavior, but that's more of setting API or internal limits as a normal part of software design to protect from mistakes, not attacks.

I've seen Texans in the wild go on tirades when the attendant at the store checkout says "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas"...

The vast majority are definitely good people, but just want to point out that the people you see in the media are real. They are here, and they are loud.

It's also easy to forget that living in the cities doesn't represent the people everywhere in the state either. As long as I'm in a city, anywhere in the US, I've never seen extremely blatant racism. But go to the wrong areas in small towns and you get jeered at for not being white.

Just gonna say y'all legit got me to reconsider how I approach parking so far this week haha

Thinking about it a bit more, I think it's more like the metrics used to get in front of a human (the automated/hr part) aren't well matched to the actual goals. We end up interviewing a lot of people who are good on paper according to the first sort, but actual good hires within that aren't as common as we'd like. But none of the engineers ever know about any of the people who were disqualified due to having an unimpressive resume...

So in the end, the initial sort does indeed end up wasting time and money, but no one's gotten around to making a good solution for this yet. The alternative so far is to interview a bunch more people, which is also really expensive anyway.

Basically, we have no efficient way to find people who are bad on paper but are actually quite skilled.

That... Isn't what I'm saying? I'm saying they won't bother to go to the interview phase with those people most of the time because they have higher probability options to try instead.

Usually getting in front of a human for an interview is the hardest step. Once you're talking, you can generally show your expertise, and most interviewers I've known are receptive to any sort of past experience that's techy and related enough, or even just problem solving related.

3/5. Work is a bit of a drag these last couple weeks, and I messed up a bit in my hobbies and made myself a bunch more work to correct that.

Just to put out the other side of this, you're competing with a lot of people with more visible credentials. If the hiring manager can look through the stack and pick out 10 people to interview all with easily understood credentials, they have no reason to consider anyone else. Interviewing isn't free for the company, every additional candidate to consider is probably at least an hour or more of time the company is paying someone for.

I mostly agree with the article, but I'll say that hiring based solely on resume experience is really hard for software. Experience honestly translates poorly to ability in my... experience.