SmoothIsFast

joined 2 years ago
[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It does not work. At most it looks like it works.

No it does work, it's just most people don't understand its just a very complex lookup table essentially using a predictive model. It doesn't think, nor feel, nor imagine, it runs a function to choose the next fitting word based on previous inputs and it's training set. In that regard it is damn good.

[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you live in the eastern part of the US, you might find it interesting to look up water rights west of the Mississippi; it is an absolute madhouse.

I'll have to check out how the west coast allocate water than should be an interesting rabbit whole to dive into.

Spent a year in Colorado not long ago. The water that fell from the sky was owned by someone else before it even hit the ground, though I think I heard that there were some changes specifically in regards to rain barrels since I left.

I mean, even if that's the case, who enforces the rights to "sell" that water? I'd assume it's some lower level employees or still municipality government that could just also up and not give a shit that some billionaire has staked claims to sell this water to whoever they please instead of allowing it to flow to those in need. Almost all the claims of ownership from those obscenely rich are more or less just expected to be respected and enforced by those who suffer from their exploitation, most systems could continue on tomorrow and gain efficiency I'd we gave the middle finger to the wealth hoarders and banks.

[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

those poor people depend on having a useful currency to trade for tools to make more food. If you crash the economy the little piece of paper we trade around right now will become worthless and we will be back to bartering until someone prints new paper or mints a new specie to use.

You are too ingrained with a monetary system you cant even imagine a system in which one doesn't exist. The miner doesn't need a currency when his food and tools are provided for. The metallurgist doesn't need to sell tools when they can give away the excess. The farmer doesn't need to sell his food when he can give away the excess. We don't need constant accumulation to distribute resources in an efficient manner. Especially when the only reason these excess products weren't given away in the first place is profit motive. Not to mention most of the labor intensive work could be outsourced to robotics where we not hoarding the physical resources for profit and war time motives, making them overtly expensive.

We live in a time where automation and robotics could allow us much more freedom and dignity however we have allowed those at the top too use that efficiency to hoard profits and resources as power management tools instead of utilizing these resources for growth and equity across our species.

This in particular is an interesting idea. Would be interesting to see what "good" a "psycopath" could do within certain limits.

There are definitely many avenues in which they could excell at. I mean decisions which need complete objectivity maybe something they excell at consulting for where as if you allow them access to gaining unmitigated power your in for a bad time as we see today.

[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Scarcity is not a creation of the uber rich, it just exacerbated by them.

40% of food is thrown out in the US every year, food scarcity is not an issue in the US at least. Sure there are certain decisions that need to be made but once again, these decisions are not required to be done by the billionaire class and are already being handled by your lower level municipality workers. It wouldn't delve into chaos because Joe stopped telling investors why they should invest, we simply need to forget about there bullshit profit motives and manage resources without a dollar valuation and instead based on how scarce the resource and its utilitarian value is when utilized in a specific process.

Scarcity is not a creation of the uber rich, it just exacerbated by them.

Exactly scarcity is the the means at which we can judge how something can be utilized, when you complicate that with dollar valuations instead of the utility and efficiency it can generate you end up in a corrupt broken system extracting wealth to those who can name prices, instead of proper resource allocation that can benefit all.

Right now it is mostly decided by economic power and a byzantine set of rules and laws dictating who owns the water.

As stated it's currently handled by municipality workers who can continue with the current process or switch to one which values the utilitarian output of a decision versus its economic value. None of the issues described are solved by or aided by the inclusion of a billionaire class, instead they, as you stated, exacerbated by such classes of individuals.

[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are you stupid? You know The Unscrupulous Man described in Ancient Greece? Countless times throughout early history they are frequently described based on their personality types and ways to "deal" with them....

[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I completely agree though with a caveat. I can't imagine a just way we would completely eliminate people like Putin.

You institutionalize them instead of giving them the keys to castels. Vikings turned their psychopaths into their most vicious fighters and isolated them from the rest, we decided to put them into positions of power both goepolitically and economically, then glorified them and it's now killing us. Before that psychopaths have been described and usually killed off on the spot. If we ever get to be a space fairing civilization it might be smart to utilize them as resource allocators on multi generation ships as their lack of empathy could actually benefit the survival of the whole in those situations but not when we allow them to use accumulation of wealth as their tool as it drains everyone's resources.

[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com 1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

You just have the workers go to the same plants produce the same food and give it away instead of allowing profits to go to the billionaires. The system is in place we just need to ignore the dumb fucks siphoning everything away. We already produce excess, and we can continue to do so....

[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What are the poor going to eat after that?

The same food they are forced to slave away to produce. Are you fucking stupid? Poor people are literally the foundation of your society not some executive flying around to talk to clients. Literally fuck off. IT has access to security controls in an org. Accountants can access funds if they need as they have the rights. Billionaires add nothing of value to this society nor to its functioning. The driver who delivers your produce, the farmer who produces it, the factory worker who packages it, the restaurant employees who cook and serve you, the gas station clerk who turns your pump on and off, the grocery store workers, the municipality workers managing waste water and electrical infrastructure, all the jobs foundational to a society are not done from billionaires and seeing the rich gone tomorrow would not change that instead it would release a burden and allow progress. Honestly it takes just a miniscule of common sense to understand this, which shows how disconnected and stupid the billionaire class and those who defend it are.

They are the good ol' I support what ever doesn't inconvenience me. Fuck em, they want to side with fascists because it's easy, they can be treated the same as its 'easier' to not distinguish them. Let em reap what they sow.

[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Have you considered it may be your attitude holding you back? I'm not a business owner, but I haven't done a decent number of interviews and participated in hiring decisions. Someone who gave even a hint of this toxicity would never be considered for any decent paying job. Most people as extreme as you seem to be can't hide it very well.

Oh, look, you worked for a company without ethics, making sure they can keep their status quo, congrats dumb ass, you're part of the problem as was described before. Any company with a backbone doesn't give a shit and will allow you to participate in community outreachs that help progressive initiatives. You are to worried about your creature comforts that you can't fathom that their are massive portions of the population without such comforts and instead of sticking up for the right to those comforts for all (which you somehow think would strip you of your comforts instead of excess from those whom are accumulating obscene amounts of captial beyond reason), you would rather villianize those attempting to make change as it could mean an inconvenience for you in the short term as changes are made, fucking pathetic.

How do you factor in the overabundance of cheap, nutritionally fucked food, and how that may affect those living paycheck to paycheck?

I eat constantly processed shit. I hate cooking, but it's still damn simple, don't get the biggest meal at McDonald's, get the low sodium/fat frozen pre cooked meals that only have a couple hundred calories per serving for under the cost of a meal from fast food. Then you just don't over eat, wait 20mins or so after and let your body naturally tell you it's full instead of eating until you want to puke. Bottled water is cheaper than cans or soda regardless of if you get them from a dollar store or not. It's literally cheaper to eat less food which is the main part of weight maintenance.

Side note, as a nurse I've seen patients who are obese because of circumstances and medical issues. Someone who has to work two jobs, has a kid, and newly discovered hypothyroidism is not obese because they don't care. They have a medical issue and no extra time/resources to compensate for it with a refined diet and exercise (especially considering one of the most common symptoms of hypothyroidism is fatigue). You're not even factoring in the undiagnosed, or those who don't have access to sufficient healthcare.

Hypothyroidism is like 5% of the population. Obesity is at 40%, let's not act like our obesity epidemic is because everyone with hypothyroidism is trying to move to the USA to boost our statistics.

My overall point is if you're targeting obese people specifically, you're not on the right track.

Na there is nuance between shaming someone for decisions made well within their control and understanding some are placed there beyond their control. I'm not advocating for those with hypothyroidism to be attacked, if anything calling out obesity would help bring awareness to those fronts as it would promote discussion about the issues instead of downplaying it so those with issues cant get the help needed like you descibed earlier in your post. Like trying to pass legislation that requires employers to give reasonable medical accommodations to those individuals so they have enough time to prep meals or even have subsidies that can give them more healthy choices at reasonable prices.

view more: ‹ prev next ›