At least it's organic toxicity
SkyeStarfall
joined 2 years ago
I don't think it's disingenuous. It represents the total share of resource consumption. If something has 2x the biomass, it consumed 2x the materials needed to produce that biomass (purely in terms of the makeup of the body, that is)
I don't think count by itself is very relevant. There's more bacteria in a glass of water than there are humans in a country, but what does that tell you, exactly?
Although I do agree the infographic should be changed to specify biomass
You're going to struggle to get a job most places if you sont know the native language
They didn't. There were plenty of anti-fascists at the time of nazi Germany. And history remembers them fondly
History, however, does not fondly remember everyone else.
not saying one should be ashamed of ones disabilities
But that's the point though. In our (at least western because that's the ones I'm familiar with) societies it is shameful to have disabilities. And pride is the opposite of shame. It's resistance against the norm
I get what you're saying, but the way I look at it is as a protest. A recognition that we're here, despite society's best efforts to sweep us under the rug
Honestly cars could just run local LLMs. It wouldn't be that expensive to implement in a car which already has a lot of computer hardware
It's inevitable that the fascist system will, sooner or later, collapse, however. It's inevitable. You cannot build an empire upon a foundation of lies.
And it's not just pets either, wildlife also gets affected by firework
Yeah it's, what, pretty much just a fancy looking wand that shoots a fancy looking projectile?
Edit: I was wrong. It was a bow
In my experience it typically is unsolicited advice. Like, you're explaining why you're having a tough time, and then they try to offer solutions, when you just wanted to explain why you're having a tough time without requesting them to help you with it, directly
Though of course, it depends on the context yeah. In one form of the situation you're right
Because it's regarding common "mainstream" solutions such as, for example, "have you tried exercising?", "have you tried going outside?", "have you tried keeping a todo-list?", etc. And not like, "have you tried this therapy session that I'm offering you for free?", or "have you tried this medication which I'm giving you access to yet?"
Because chances are, there are things that are yet to be done, but those are not things that the average person who is about to suggest something might be able to do
No it's definitively people who accurately predicted where things are now that have been told to stop overreacting
Think about how the world was 10 years ago. If someone were to accurately predict how today would look, would they have been taken seriously?
Of course not. Just like people aren't being taken seriously today regarding climate change. Just as people aren't being taken seriously today when they say the US is following the path of nazi Germany. How concentration camps will (are) be built, how gas chambers might happen. How genocide against minorities is in progress.
I've been told I'm overreacting multiple times over the years. And you know what the worst thing is? It got worse, faster, than I thought it would. I underreacted.
Things are going to be bad