SkyeStarfall

Mobile VR is the obvious next step for VR. You just won't have as good of an experience with a cable unless you have a very dedicated setup

It's most definitively gonna allow for streaming via Wi-Fi

I want more complex games though

Definitively not, this is something that tends to occur at low skill levels in MOBAs, but gets better at higher levels as people figure out how to actually play the strategic layer

I've lost plenty of lanes but came back in the midgame, there's a lot to do throughout the game, early, middle, and late. It's also about your team being able to adapt to the circumstances and execute the correct strategy at the right time taking into account the situation for your team

And people struggling to do this is just a natural part of a competitive game, really. And sure, snowballing is a thing, but so are comebacks.

The question wasn't whether it's inevitable, but whether it's possible

And the answer to whether it's possible is a clear: Yes, because we already have general intelligence

But it's very much not an inevitability, no. Civilization could always collapse before we get to that point, after all

That the human brain exists is enough evidence that intelligence is possible. An AGI similar to the human brain is then possible at a minimum

Can't say much more than that for sure, but you have a starting point.

Maybe you just don't like MOBAs, to me it's one of the most promising upcoming pvp games, but I am someone who likes MOBAs and shooters

Also the "kid repeller" devices (because yes, it also includes younger people such as infants, and also older people), is that it just makes the world a hostile place for young people, and then later people turn around and complain how "nobody goes outside anymore"

In addition, this severely affects animals too

I mean, the trolley problem is just a starting point. It's literally one of the simplest thought experiments

The next set of thought experiments goes something more like "say you have 5 people in need of organ transplants, and 1 health person with those organs, do you kill them and take their organs to save 5 others?"

And even later you got another like "there is a dirty nuclear bomb in the middle of the city, and you got someone who you think might be responsible, do you torture them to maybe get a way to defuse the bomb out of them?"

And so on

The trolley problem is literally just a starting point in philosophy class, the experiments get more elaborate, closer to the real world, and less certain as you move towards greater understanding. Until at some point you just deal with real issues such as abortion or animal welfare (like whether veganism is the morally correct choice, which is a lot more controversial than I think it ever should be, but I digress), and the shortcomings of ethical systems and which ones maybe come closest to our intuitions (and then you got philosophers such as Hume which thought that our moral intuition is the only thing that matters), and so on.

Things are a lot lot more nuanced than just the trolley problem, and there are some really tough bullets to bite for utilitarianism in thought experiments. Or at least showing the need to rework the system somewhat, but then it isn't just a simple "best outcome" even in clear-cut situations.

In practice though, nobody really follows a strict ethical system, and it does show an interesting problem of trying to codify morality into a rational and consistent system. And we get to these edge cases typically by thought experiments, and then try to go from there. Breaking our theories by pushing them to the limits.

But while nobody follows a strict system, you still see elements of these systems in people's behaviours and choices. Such as maximizing a moral quantity (utilitarianism), or doing what is considered to be a good person thing to do (virtue), or Kantianism, or any numerous of subcategories and other systems which don't fall neatly into the typical categories. But, for example, in hospitals under triage, they typically follow a kind of utilitarian system

It's less effort and typically more realistic (in the sense that it looks more real, not that it is)

But it's unethical either way, don't make non-consensual porn

The most annoying thing since the rise of LLMs is that everyone thinks that all of AI is just LLMs

Classification machine learning models can also be neural networks, which is something that was called AI also

As far as I could tell, it was never intended to be a serious quote, especially because the person saying this was the literal villain that was being portrayed as not sane

It's in closed beta right now