SkyeStarfall

joined 2 years ago
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 months ago

Sure, in high school or maybe early college

But the further in you get, the deeper you go into a topic, the more specialized you are, the harder it gets to condense the vast amount of knowledge you have into a reasonable space. Once you do stuff like a master's thesis or a PhD thesis, you could just write and write and write and write, there's so much you could put into that document, because there's almost endless amounts of depth

Once you start to truly get deep into a subject, you'd be surprised by how quickly the pages fill up when you try to just comprehensively transfer the necessary information onto paper

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 months ago

Just like all the people saying how "I was hit as a child and I turned out fine!" and then want to hit kids

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago

What they are, are statistical models. You can verify the output, you know

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

AI has been used for tons of useful stuff for ages, you just never heard about it unless you were in the space until LLMs came around

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I think vision would fall girly within the realms of physics. I don't know if you can justifiably call it visual anymore when it incorporates magic

It's like, if there's magic bow that launches arrows at a far greater rate than it normally would, would you say that the energy comes from the buildup and release of tension in the wood? There's another element there, which enhances the thing

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 months ago (4 children)

That would fall under "nonvisual perception"

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago

It's been at least half a year

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Sure, go on grindr and learn how to be a good dom

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's actually not the worst. It seems doable to produce that much square area of solar panels, even for a civilization like us. We need about 500 000 square kilometers of solar panels on the Earth's surface to power our global electrical needs. This is within the realm of possibility

The more tricky part is to actually position it around the sun, that part is what makes it impossible for our current tech level and space infrastructure

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 4 months ago

Who said you need to catch all of it in a single panel??

The reason nasa goes overboard (though, not really), is because it's worth it for space stuff. On the surface we have an abundance of space

view more: ‹ prev next ›