SkyeStarfall
They all are in search of life in some form. They look for water, they analyze soil, they analyze the atmosphere, and so on.
If life existed, it would create byproducts we could detect, or we could find water which is likely to be a pre-requisite for life.
All of these things, in some form, relate to life.
It's never said openly, but quite literally, yes.
After all, food is a commodity. Housing is a commodity. Hell, healthcare in the US is privatized. If you can't pay, you're often screwed.
Not to mention sweatshops, pollution, improper disposal of waste, worsening climate change, supporting wars for money...
The list goes on. Our world is run by the principle of "private properly is more important than lives".
Yeah, no, sorry, I'm not gonna side against the protestors. What they should truly do is halt the whole economy, to really make the people in power feel it.
Anything less than that and it can just be ignored.
So you see anything wrong with the people in power basically dooming humanity to a climate ravaged future?
Because to me that is far far far more extreme and unacceptable than some small number of protestors.
I wish protestors could go far further. They are perfectly justified in doing so.
Uh, so you shouldn't criticize games here..?
I prefer people giving their honest opinions to whatever they think the collective deems acceptable.
The big problem is that this AI development was inevitable. If not a private company, then a state, it not the US, then it's China. If they wouldn't, then it could be any other technologically advanced country.
And if still none developed it, a small group of individuals would.
We have simply gotten to the point where we have sufficient computing power to make this possible. And now society needs to figure out how to proceed in the correct manner.
You never care about security until you get your credentials stolen
Do a significant amount of people using wayland even want or need to remote exactly like in X?
Can you elaborate on why you think this is a psychological problem?
Heavily relatable ngl
Weeeeell, not exactly.
It is true that things are all relative to each other. But think about it this was, if you fly out in a Starship in one direction for a light year, then turn around exactly 180 degrees and fly back, you wouldn't arrive back at earth, right? Mainly because things are accelerating due to gravity. And acceleration breaks symmetry.
It would of course depend on how time travel works, but since time and space are linked, it wouldn't be unreasonable to assume that you follow the same trajectory in space as you move through time. But that would be a straight line in the space+time dimensions still. Think of the paths in Minkowski diagrams.