SkyeStarfall

joined 2 years ago
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The truth is, we do have enough resources. We just care more about the economy and profit than our future climate (which will also strongly affect the economy, but that's in the future so...).

If we actually valued the climate as much as we ought to, switching fully to renewables would be a bargain.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

To me it always seemed weird how saying "we should eradicate jews by our own hand" or "we should kill this jew" would probably not be okay because of inciting violence, but saying "we should eradicate jews... Through the law/state" instead is perfectly acceptable and not inciting violence.

Is one level of indirection really enough to make it okay? The end result is the same.

This is also why such free speech has problems. If you're the one spewing that shit it's all fine and dandy for you, but if you're the targeted minority what can you do, exactly? Certainly you cannot legally physically defend yourself! You're just destined to have to defend your literal existence with speech, like jeez. It's so lopsided.

Yeah, the only person who has said it to me on my life is someone who is deep in conspiracy theories. For some "weird" reason I don't have this problem with anyone else in my life.

Sometimes it's more about the other person.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Here's a big question though

What's the difference between predatory tactics to hook people into a game, and "normal" gameplay, whatever that is? If neither cost any money or have microtransactions in any way?

Is Diablo 2 using predatory mechanics? Is Counter Strike? Is Factorio?

Games are artificial constructs. If you deconstruct them entirely, unless they got some story to tell as the center point of the game, their mechanics and goals are entirely artificial and constructed to get you to keep playing, be engaged, and have fun, whatever that means and implies.

Because, well, in the end, games do not have a grand purpose. Their purpose is entertainment(or be art, but not all games have that goal). And so if vampire survivors keep you engaged and enjoy the game... Is that really that much different to other games? Another example to this are idle/incremental games, as a pure distillation of what games are. Are they predatory? Is there really much difference from the very core of other, more "proper", games?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Most food is harvested by machines

The point is that less animals = less food needed. And less people need to grow food

And if some people still need to hand harvest food, well, then that's not an engineering problem, but a political one. And either way irrelevant to your statement, because it was then never about the food needed anyway.

I don't get how this has anything to do with "not hating because your rent is 3k a month" when it comes to having just 10k

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How do you budget rent away

Or maybe getting people uncomfortable and forced to think about it, and actively face the dissonance is effective. Maybe they get mad and confrontational, but then you have to ask why.

Why are you doing something whose moral implications are making you uncomfortable?

Same thing goes for shit like buying stuff made by people in horrible working conditions. Maybe we shouldn't feel as if we are entitled to being comfortable all the time, especially when we do so at the expense of others. What if it was you in the place of the worker or animal? Are you okay with continuing on like this?

And it makes people uncomfortable because it makes them see themselves as a bad person. But hey, maybe you should feel uncomfortable if you are doing something you yourself consider bad.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Animals eat a significant chunk of the plant calories we grow, you know.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My apartment, which is about 22 square meters, costs me the equivalent of 1300 dollars a month. Add in a electricity, food, Public transit card, mobile data, and other small necessary things, and it's at least 1800 dollars a month. And that's without any extra expenses like fun things.

Which would, of course, last under 6 months. That's not a lot of time. I'd need to start a job search immediately to be safe.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yeah, it could actually work if it's tuned properly. Certainly it could at least be an additional tool for moderators.

view more: ‹ prev next ›