It would contain just a big "E"
SkyeStarfall
joined 2 years ago
Yes, but the problem is, we are stuck with the system until we force a societal level change. Capitalism works plenty well enough for the powerful, and they aren't willing to let go that easily.
But a lot of jobs did get automated away. And serious consequences did occur from that. Sometimes places rebound from it, but sometimes they did not. And at some point... there will be more people than jobs for them to do, as we continue automating.
In the end, the base foundation for capitalism will be broken, and we will be in an economic crisis of unprecedented scales.
It won't for as long as all the power is in the capital owner's hands.
Yes, exactly, the developed world should aid the developing world as much as possible in providing them clean technologies.
We are rich enough. We can afford that. And we all benefit in the end (because, after all, a lot of our supplies originate from developing countries).
If working from home was standard, there'd be less need for offices, and less, smaller, offices would exist. Leading to less energy wasted in heating offices (as well as .kre space for residential).
True, but it's always like, planes are more expensive in the long run.
It's more expensive to build a solar panel than burn coal. But after the coal has been burned, the solar panel still stays up.
Yes I know, but I legitimately thought it was the onion. It took me until I was reading the comments.
Eh, nah, that actually doesn't happen to me. I do clean eventually.
The thing is, allowing people to give shit education to their kids shouldn't even be allowed, because that removes the autonomy of the child itself.
Removing sex ed is basically saying that people shouldn't be allowed to know information about their own bodies and minds which is absurd when you think about it. But I guess that's the state of politics now. I just feel bad for the kids.
No, not deep fried, surreal or absurd