SirEDCaLot

joined 2 years ago
[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 27 points 3 days ago

When you buy a game, doesn't matter the platform, you pay for it with a credit card. The credit card companies are holding the game platform hostage, saying either they start censoring what games they sell or they lose the ability to process any credit cards for any games at all.
That is essentially holding a gun to their heads, if they can't process credit cards they can't bring in any money and they might as well just close shop and go home because their business is finished.
You can boycott steam or itch or whatever else, but they all use the same credit card processing systems- Visa, MasterCard, Discover, etc. if they start applying these policies to all game retailers, it will simply become impossible to buy any vaguely pornographic game. Period. Anywhere.

Thus, boycotting steam or itch is counterproductive. They are victims just as much as the consumers. They have no desire to ban these games, they were happily selling these games a week ago. But when they are being told 'ban a bunch of low volume games or you cease to exist as a company' that is what they do.

Thus, this phone call campaign. It is focusing on the credit card companies, the ones who are actually applying this pressure to game companies.

It is telling them we do not want them dictating what people are and are not allowed to spend money on. We do not want them to enforce morality. And if they got the impression we did, it's because a small minority made a couple of phone calls.

The idea is if 1,000 people call in and complain about the porn game, and 100,000 people call in and complain about the censorship, hopefully they will get the message.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

Why would I ever want to turn it off?
Under my desk I have like 15 things plugged in. None of them ever get unplugged. Turning off the outlet is of literally zero value to me. Making those plugs into a giant fucking black hole mass that takes up half the desk is not something I want.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago

Mass storage is a block level protocol, phone can't also use the storage while mounted via mass storage. This required a dedicated storage volume on the phone that could be locked to apps while connected by USB.

MTP (media transfer protocol) is a file level protocol, like a shared folder, that doesn't lock the storage for exclusive use. Phones use this now.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Yeah but the plug is FUCKING HUGE.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm with you on the white space thing. Spaces, especially multiples of spaces, should not have a programming function.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 85 points 1 week ago (64 children)

All jokes aside, things like this are why China is beating us. I am absolutely not a fan of the Chinese government, but the simple fact is they get shit done.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

Come on now let's be civil, even AIDS patients understand the Constitution 😝

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago

Just the first one I could find, there were a few of these cases

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/23/europe/shamima-begum-appeal-loses-intl

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 24 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What a shocker. This is like the handful of Western teenage girls who went to Afghanistan to try and be good Muslims, then discovered that meant being married off to some Islamic State soldier twice their age. Like what the fuck did you think was going to happen?

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

With respect, if you've never in 70 years heard the argument that 'this specific election is too important, we have to nominate the best chance to beat the other guy', then you must either not be paying attention or your memory is failing you.
In fact, go back to 2016 and that is exactly what happened. Hillary was seen as the 'safe' option to put up against Trump, Bernie was the 'radical candidate who wouldn't get broad popular support'.

I am NOT drawing an equivalence between Donald Trump and other presidents. I am talking purely about campaigns and the discourse about them.

I don't like Trump, but he's on his second term. He's done. He's not running for election again. The question is, what do we do in 2028? Who do we put forward for the nation's consideration?
Is it going to be another Hillary / Kamala type 'safe' candidate? Because they haven't done so well of late.
Or is it going to be somebody who has a strong message of principle, someone who can energize millions in the same way that Barack Obama did and Donald Trump did more recently?

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I'm not a Trump fan. But I've been an adult long enough to remember this being said about just about every election. That yeah we should do better we will eventually do better but not this time, right now it's most important to get rid of the other party or make them lose the election no matter what. It's the same thing every few years.

It's like hitting the snooze button over and over and over again, if you keep hitting it eventually your alarm times out or you just end up late for work.

view more: next ›