Sinnerman

joined 2 years ago
[–] Sinnerman@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (7 children)

the data vultures love this sort of “non-confrontational on surface, but bossy upon analysis” discourse.

We need a simple name for this, like we have for enshittification or shrinkflation.

[–] Sinnerman@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

ikr the real losers are the ones who read Gizmodo.

[–] Sinnerman@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

because they have a solid reputation for never listening to those millions.

Specifically, if you volunteer to moderate, create content, or build community on Reddit, you will be insulted and dismissed by people who are only in it for the money.

[–] Sinnerman@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

It feels raw and real, vs reddits polished curated feel. As if I'm actually reading posts by people.

Because on reddit we were reading posts by bots.

[–] Sinnerman@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Apparently it's called "The New Governess" but that's all I've been able to figure out:
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Edmund_Blair_Leighton_-_The_New_Governess.jpg

[–] Sinnerman@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

But what are the chances that StoryGraph will undergo enshittification?

[–] Sinnerman@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

There was an article in Foreign Policy a couple days ago talking about how China's WeChat is the only real Everything App, but it was a product of a very specific time and place.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/07/31/elon-musk-wechat-twitter-x-united-states-everything-apps/

The conclusion is that there's not likely to be another Everything App. I'm still thinking that over, but it sounds plausible.

[–] Sinnerman@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It should be an unconditional requirement that the day your university receives a penny of public funding your papers must be public domain.

Some grants do have this requirement. So publishers just charge you extra to make your article "open source".

Truly, academic publishers are vile people who make the world a worse place.

[–] Sinnerman@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's telling that most of their problems were regulatory/legal rather than technical. (they only have one bullet point about "a bunch of techy stuff".)

But the whole article has a very strong "how do you do, fellow kids?" vibe. I think the fediverse will manage to survive without the Financial Times' mastodon server.

[–] Sinnerman@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

The whole point of Oulipo is "the seeking of new structures and patterns".

Constraints inspire creativity, so let's come up with new constraints.

If you only allow one structure/constraint, that's the opposite of what Oulipo is about.

Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oulipo
"Oulipo Compendium" is a fun book if you can find it.
Motte's "Oulipo: A Primer of Potential Literature" is OK but a bit dry. Looks like there've been a couple new surveys recently too.

The mastodon community Oulipo.social only allows one structure/constraint, so it's not that interesting. If you know of any good Oulipo communities in the fediverse, I'd be thrilled to hear about them.

view more: ‹ prev next ›