Showroom7561

joined 2 years ago
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

One of these days I’d like to get a Brompton C-line but they’re stupid expensive.

It really would be nice if Brompton came out with a sub-$1000 bike. Not only would they reclaim market share in this space, but those riders would very likely upgrade to the more expensive models down the line.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Do Republicans have separate washrooms for men and women in their homes?

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 weeks ago

Imagine serving because you believe that you're protecting the country from a foreign military threat, only to be tasked with verifying genital compliance for bathrooms.

It would be better to shovel shit. Way more honour and respect from society.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I've got a bag for my Tern folding bike, but it's a PITA because the bike folds like a book (so it's wide). Plus, it's got 20" wheels. A Brompton would be easy to fold up and carry around in a bag.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I like the idea of an electric folding bike that isn't 60 lbs, but single speed and integrated battery pack makes it less desirable.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

That bike! Easily fits in this:

😂

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Interesting. I just noticed (yesterday) an IKEA Mason jar I have is made in China. Which I thought was odd.

I'm in Canada, so were probably sent the cheap shit 😮‍💨

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem is on-street parking. Removing it would easily allow for plenty of space for pedestrians and businesses.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

So does just no one care about swappable cells anymore?

I do. It's a major deal-breaker for me when something has a built-in battery, and on so many levels: environmental, repairability, long-term durability, safety, etc.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

There is no deal to be had with Trump. He is a bad faith actor not bound by honour, credibility, a supreme court, the rule of law or Congress.

There is literally no point in negotiating anything. Whatever agreement that is signed, won’t be honored.

I have to agree. What's the point of "negotiating" with a criminal fraudster? He literally changes his mind more than he changes his underwear. There is no "deal" or "contract" or "agreement" with him.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I use Mailbox.org for email (private, paid email from the EU), and they have several options for alias support and temporary email.

I've actually got a few paid accounts, and the service has been excellent over the last several years (maybe 4 or 5... it's been long).

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 weeks ago

I just call that "a virus in a different partition". LOL

 

Hey guys. I'm curious about this type of scenario, because I see two ways of approaching it and neither seems like the best way.

Legend for the photo: MUP = multiuse path; SW = sidewalk; BL = bike lane (sharrows, but it turns to a bike lane).

Assuming you were on the MUP going north, and wanted to turn onto the bike lane heading west.

What's the best/safest/legal way to do this?

A. Use the crosswalk (not a crossride, so you'd need to get off your bike and walk) and position yourself on the lane facing west?

B. Turn from the MUP straight into the bike lane on a green? This would mean going across two lanes.

C. Position on the left turn lane of the road, and make the left turn from that lane? Cars turning right don't make this easy or safe.

For context, there is a bus route going south to north, and this particular road has a lot of speeders. What I'd think would be safe, usually isn't.

If this were an intersection with cyclists in mind, it would have a large green box for cyclists to move into to make the turn safely. In that case, I'd think C would be the most ideal. But without that, what's the next best?

I tend to choose A at this particular intersection, but that's nearly gotten me run over by people turning left from the north side.

Thoughts?

EDIT: Thank you for all the input, guys. I will stick with "A" (which is a Copenhagen left turn), and will suggest to my city to add a proper green painted bike box at this intersection for cyclists to safely make these turns.

 

Any time saved by ordering online and picking up the order has vanished chasing customer support people to fix something that would have taken a few seconds through their website.

 

Truly a disturbing letter. All aspects of it.

 

Went to order some cat treats and saw that I could get a 25% discount when I sign up for Amazon's subscribe feature.

So I clicked on it and the total in my cart didn't reflect a 25% discount.

When I went back to see what was up, I noticed that the discount went down to 5%.

Unclicking the box will show a 25% discount again...

UPDATE: A commenter mentioned that the text reads "up to 25%", so I went to a different item, added it to my cart and got:

But clicking on that checkbox also brings it back down to 5%.

 

Is this new, or have online accounts never offered the ability to update your email address easily?

 

I watched a video from Zero Friction Cycling where he tested a bunch of chain checker tools.

The original video can be found here.

Only a few were accurate, and the Park Tool CC-3.2 check that I've been using for a few years now, seems to be one of the bad ones.

Today, I decided to get the CC-4 (the Shimano checker they recommended isn't available in Canada, apparently), and rechecked the chains on my bike.

It went from "beyond 0.5mm wear" with the CC-3.2 to "not even close to 0.5mm" on the CC-4.

I guess I figured out why my chains weren't lasting long... according to the CC-3.2. 🤑😭

What chain checker tool(s) are you guys using, and have you used any that were just flat out wrong?

 

Here we go. Autonomous vehicles are now mowing down cyclists.

I hope that Waymo's insurance is good!

 

The camera captures so much data, that you can read street signs from the top of the building just by digitally zooming!

 

I just hope the house numbers aren't similar!

 

Seeing how incredible the transformation of Montreal has been for cyclists and pedestrians, I applaud Quebec City for expanding their active transportation system with this announcement, too!

Marchand says this project is not "a war on cars" but he does not have information about how existing roadways or lanes will be affected by the cycling network.

Well, data from every major city that has implemented a robust cycling network tends to show that traffic congestion will be reduced, people will be healthier, local businesses will benefit, and safety all around will improve.

Bravo, Quebec City!

view more: ‹ prev next ›