Showroom7561

joined 2 years ago
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

Less really is more! LOL

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Dr. Sbaitso never asked me to commit atrocities.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, just wait. AI will all be tweaked to sell you shit.

It's only a matter of time before product placement in AI generated photos and videos becomes a thing, too.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

"Stop the windmills", he said.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Wow, what a read!

I was never a Komoot user. What happened to them, and the direction they are taking, is bound to happen to any and all platforms where corporate greed is the driving force.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Every single place that mandated helmets (or heavily promoted) saw absolutely no reduction in death/injury.

There are too many variables to go over every country (i.e. mandated only for kids and teens). And even when they are mandated, compliance may still be low (B.C, Canada has helmet laws for all ages, yet compliance is <70%).

That said, every study I've seen, including meta-data analysis, shows benefit.

For instance THIS very recent study:

"The empirical evidence based on the real-world hospital and police data as well as biomechanical studies confirms that wearing a helmet while cycling is beneficial, regardless of age and crash severity, in collisions with others or not. The relative benefit is higher in high-risk situations and when cycling on shared roads. The findings from the meta-analyses studies that have been reviewed in this paper are remarkably consistent."

The classic example is Australia – it had almost no helmet usage prior to passing a nationwide law. The law was strictly enforced with extremely high fines, and yet there was no real change comparing before/after the law.

Wait, what? This Australia?

Quoting Professor Jake Olivier of UNSW’s School of Mathematics and Statistics and Deputy Director of the Transport and Road Safety (TARS) Research Centre:

"There was an immediate 46 per cent reduction in the rate of cycling fatalities per 100,000 population following the introduction of bicycle helmet legislation in Australia,” he says.

“This decline has been maintained since 1990 and we estimate 1332 fewer cycling fatalities associated with the introduction of bicycle helmet legislation to date.”

And you also have to consider that non-injuries (i.e. walking away from a fall because of your helmet) won't be reported, so the benefit may very well be significantly higher.

All I can say is that I'd rather be wearing a helmet than not, in the event that my head hits any object, at any speed. It's such a "set and forget" piece of gear, and I know people who have walked away from crashes (not involving cars, just crashes due to poor surfaces) yet their helmets basically crumbled upon impact. Way better than the alternative.

But you do you. I don't want to force anyone to do something they don't automatically see as a benefit on the bike.

As one study put it, "Unhelmeted injured cyclists were frequent commuter cyclists who generally do not regard cycling as safe yet choose not to wear helmets for reasons largely related to convenience and comfort. " 🤷‍♂️

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Yup. Spend hundreds of millions so that more people can sit in traffic? No problem, we'll start work tomorrow!

Ask for a 100m multiuse path so that cyclists don't get killed by crazed SUV drivers? "ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR GODDAMN MIND?? Who is going to pay for that? What about the kids? How will seniors survive?! What about my parking space! Cyclists don't follow the rules! Where's your helmet?!! I didn't see you!!!!!" 😒😮‍💨

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago

"There is a common goal, to make city streets safe."

Really? It sounds like cyclists are disproportionately being targeted, while the real dangers are being treated lightly.

But I'll also say that I hate the fact that an industry (i.e. food delivery) is ruining cycling for everyone else.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

I wonder if a cast iron crock pot would work, too. Those are dirt cheap second hand. They weigh a ton, though 😞

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Goddamn. 😮

OK, a quick double-check (all I have time for), suggests these Ill effects come in mega doses (unreasonably high doses, like the equivalent of dozens of pounds of sugar), and/or in rodents.

At the same time, I see studies claiming that stevia has quite a few health benefits, ranging from preventing tooth decay to reducing tumors.

And the fermented variety in the OP should be even safer/better.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I've never had any interferences.

All my microwaves in the last 20 years cause interference from several rooms away! Like Bluetooth headsets dropping signal.

I have a device that measures radiation and EMF, and that thing spikes when the microwave is on, too. 😮

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago

The driver and a passenger fled on foot, and despite an "intensive search" by additional officers and the police canine unit could not be located, OPP said.

This pisses me off.

 

This store just opened up a few months back, and they had zero bike parking.

I emailed their head office, saying that I was planning to shop there, but not until they added a bike rack.

Went to check last night, and boom! Bike rack!

 

“They are not safe. They are anything but for safety,” said a woman who added vehicles in the two-block section sometimes drive in the middle of Springbrook to avoid the bollards.

Oh, so drivers behind of the wheel of an automobile are the danger. Why remove the bike lanes rather than the car lanes?

I heard that Etobicoke's NIMBYs are insane, but this is a new level of stupidity from Richmond Hill.

 

Walking my grandkid to/from school, it absolutely floors me how many dangerous drivers there are around kids.

In a matter of maybe 10 minutes, I've witnessed:

  • at least a dozen cars illegal parked. It's not the parking that bothers me, but the fact that these cars are often parked on turns or just before intersections, making it impossible for other drivers to see small kids.
  • Several people not stopping at stop signs, including at the exit of the school parking lot.
  • One car, who completely blew through a stop sign at the front of the school, made a left turn and nearly hit a guy walking his kid. The driver didn't even slow down.
  • Super fucking huge pickup trucks parked in the school parking lot, but their long ass hangs well over the sidewalk near the kindergarden area, leaving very little space to use the sidewalk.
  • Speeding. Obviously, you have to have speeding in school zones, right?

This happens every day, during drop off and pick up. I was told that bylaw were “cracking down”, but no, they aren't. If they were, our municipality would generate $5000 in fines each and every day at every school.

The other day, I rode my bike past another school as kids were getting out. Not only was their massive parking lot completely full, but they had blocked the bike trail (WITH PYLONS) to make space for more cars. Then as I entered onto the road, cars were illegally parked along the road and on a bridge for a like 100m. Making it extremely difficult and dangerous to cross because they blocked visibility for me and other drivers on the road.

I asked the cross guard if these students all lived out of town, requiring every parent to drive them home; he obviously didn't get my joke.

Seriously, fuck cars. All of them!

 

Been watching the Q&A with this guy... total clown. He evaded every question about bike lanes and keeps pounding the idea that "We will always be building! [more roads]".

I will tell you one thing, I'm not usually one to take the lane unless absolutely necessary, but I'd be happy to do so every time in protest of any Ontario's proposed actions to go backwards on sane, cycling infrastructure.

Also, the focus is always about reducing congestion and gridlock... guys, YOU ARE THE CONGESTION AND GRIDLOCK! Stop making cars the only way to travel, and you'll magically solve your problem.

 

Toronto, please don't normalize hit-and-runs.

 

"She said she didn’t see us. Didn’t see us. She was very, very upset."

The driver did stop and is not expected to be charged.

This makes me furious, but it's completely expected.

Cars are the only weapon where you can kill someone without consequence, even if it was pure negligence or entirely on purpose.

 

In my persistence to fit Linux in my life, I'm curious if some "must have" Windows software will work better if I just ran a Windows VM within Linux.

None of the software I need to work is needed to work continuously. They are basically programs that I fire up when needed, for a few minutes, then exited.

Wine will install them, but not run them, so I'm hoping a VM is the answer as I'm not interested in dual-booting to run a few Windows programs occasionally.

 

Also, "identical" has a different meaning here.

There's a special place in hell for the monster who dreamed up this captcha!

 

I've been trying out NextDNS and comparing it to Adguard DNS (adguard-dns-.io), but unlike NextDNS, Adguard DNS' query log is quite vague, and I can't even tell if it's doing anything.

99% of the listed items in the Adguard DNS query log show up as "Processed", but the request clearly shows either advertiser or tracking as the categories.

It seems that unless I actually click BLOCK, the status doesn't really list these requests as Blocked, except for a very small number.

Is this normal behaviour? I assume any requests showing "processed" but not "blocked" are still going through, which is bad. NextDNS shows these same requests clearly as blocked or not, so at least I know that it's working.

Anyone have any thoughts, or clarification on how it works?

 

I'm talking about the ads that look like listings, but they have a small "AD" text on the corner.

These ads are often grotesque and offensive, and I'd rather not see them at all.

I've tried various block lists, but it's not removing them.

MORE CONTEXT: Sorry, I should have been more specific!

The gross/offensive ads seem to only be in the Aliexpress app (Android).

On the mobile and desktop browser version, I still get the "AD" listings, but they are of products related to things I've purchased or browse through (all bike related items). I'd like to get rid of those, too, but I guess the ones in the app are the worst type.

I do have Adguard for Android set to filter HTTPS requests from the Ali app, so I figure it's just a matter of finding the right filter. Hopefully, anyway!

 

The upgraded model has the same low-end adjustability and a wider wide vs the old style. Yet, it's only compatible with 27.5 - 29"?

Typo?

view more: ‹ prev next ›