You have the older one then
Shimitar
joined 2 years ago
Add Pam or basic auth to nginx and you are done.
Mine does av1... So?
Amazon firestick pro.
Sysvinit on gentoo here. Its so simple and clean, all can be managed and hacked via bash scripts.
I see no benefits in my use cases for systemd. Boot speed is unneeded, service auto-restart is done via Monit, anything else I don't need.
This is true for all my server -and- all my workstations and laptops as well.
Systemd never solved a problem needed to be solved to start with.
Now that it also does coffee and cream for you, i start seeing some benefits like auto-restart services. Was it worthwhile? Meh, dunno.
At first it seemed another case of "I am too young and I want stuff done my way just because" and redhat shoved it down everybody throath to gain marked dominance. That they did.
At least now systemd looks like mature and finally start making sense. I was even contemplating testing a migration on one server.
Then I remembered, I like freedom of choice and keeping up being an old fart, so I didn't (yet).
(No, for Wayland and network manager I think they are both welcome and needed from the start).
It didn't help the main Dev suckass attitude, that didn't made friends.
This is a great reason, I didn't know, but its interesting.
Fair, setting up ssh tunnels with autoreconnect and such is indeed more complex.
La falla in realtà è stata scoperta abbastanza presto e solo Arch linux e parzialmente Gentoo sono impattati.
In ogni caso tocca solo i sistemi con SystemD quindi stock gentoo non è vulnerabile. Non so Arch.
Il vero punto piuttosto è riflettere sulla debolezza della sicurezza sul rilascio di software a tutti i livelli. La falla infatti non è nel repisitory di XZ ma viene iniettata nel tar rilasciato su github per colpa di un contribitor compromesso (o malevolo).
Curioso anche come la falla utilizzi parte di codice committato, ma inattivo, che viene attivato solo dal tarball che, appunto, è stato compromesso. On pratica clonare il repo è sicuro, fidarsi del TAR su github, no.
Anything I can download again doesn't get backup, but it sits on a RAID-1. I am ok at losing it due to carelessness but not due to a broken disk. I try to be carefully when messing with it and that's enough, I can always download again.
Anything like photos notes personal files and such gets backedup via restic to a disk mounted to the other side of the house. Offsite backup i am thinking about it, but not really got to it yet. Been lucky all this time.
From 10tb of stuff, the totality of my backupped stuff amount to 700gb. Since 90% of are photos, the backup size is about 700gb too. The actually part of that 700gb that changes (text files, documents..) amount to negligible. The photos never change, at most grow a bit over time.
Why rathole and not ssh tunneling? The latter exposes only one port (that you are already exposing anyway) while the former requires an additional port.
What is the actual benefit of rathole? I an asking genuinely.
Rent a cheap vps and do something like I did with ssh tunneling, or wireguard VPN, between home and the vps:
https://wiki.gardiol.org/doku.php?id=router:ssh_tunnel
(Sorry I keep posting links to my wiki but the whole point was writing once)
Sono trappole per attirare venture capitals. Ai è il nuovo fud, ma verso cui convergono i fondi per cui tutti li.
Ovvio che la bolla scoppierà.