ShellMonkey

joined 11 months ago
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 9 points 8 months ago

They're based out or Arkansas, the only reason they ever had any kind of DEI is there wasn't a pending presidency by someone who's made it a point to say get rid of every DEI program everywhere.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I tend to find the R820 behind me to be a pretty reliable host so long as you don't mind footing the power bill to run it.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Busted hip falling on the stairs while on a official trip. OP thinks it's clever to assume being drunk.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 7 points 8 months ago

An absurd amalgamation of a 4 part while house filter, a softener, and an under sink reverse osmosis thing for drinking water.

The water here has enough dissolved solids in it that before I put in that stuff if the pipes got a pinhole leak in them it would seal itself within a couple hours at the expense of everything having a white crust on it.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 12 points 8 months ago

There was a question posed about 60s flower children and such a bit ago they had someone saying they were one, so somewhere 70+ I'd guess.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Right, and there are more types of liability than an employee's action...

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 1 points 8 months ago

https://www.northernbrewer.com/products/draft-brewer-flex-keg-system

Something like this is available from a lot of places, just gonna cost.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Why? Because it creates a separate entity. If you where to hypothetically clone yourself, should you be responsible for the actions of the clone? Perhaps more directly, assuming you work for someone, should the owner of whatever place your work for be personally/individually responsible for your actions?

That separation is created because otherwise nobody would ever employ anyone if their employee's actions could get them sued personally.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

The company doesn't have 'less' liability, it has separate liability.

You wouldn't expect that you would be responsible for the actions of a roommate in most cases. Creating a business entity separates the business from the person running it. The taxes are separate, the owned properties are separate, the liabilities are separate.

Say you own a small restaurant, The building it resides in (if you owned it) is owned wholely by the company. You also own a personal residence. Now a customer comes in and suffers some injury and they sue. They would sue the business and if it all went badly for you they might take ownership of the business assets including the building it's in. They could NOT however come take your personal residence that's not property of the business.

If you tried to do some shady biz and change ownership of the assets away from the company before a judgement was made then the customer could feasibly 'pierce the veil' as they say and include you into the suit personally.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 43 points 8 months ago (3 children)

If Trump gets his way the whole EPA won't exist anymore, so any rules on undoing the ban would go with it.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 66 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They invented Germany, that was a pretty big deal

view more: ‹ prev next ›