ShellMonkey

joined 11 months ago
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 106 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A reliable source on TV told me you can't go wrong with

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For me a lot of it is in trying to maximize efficiencies. Setting up task duties and resources where you have plenty enough but not overloading your storage. Defensive position designs to counter any possible situation. Layouts to the base to allow free movement.

Lot of others try for specific artistic ideas or scenario goals, but I'm something of engineer minded player.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

From my non-lawyer understanding, copyrights on a photo reside with the creator of the photo, however, the person who is in the photo would have some ownership of their likeness kind of like a trademark where you would have to argue for rights to the use of it.

So basically the only people who could really claim anything would be the owners of the security cam for that pic that everyone has latched onto.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 42 points 8 months ago (12 children)

Rimworld, way too much Rimworld. A big part of it is that I'll often have it one a second computer during the workday just on pause to pop in during downtime but I guess that still counts as playtime just being loaded.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Just wait until they start pushing ads onto your vision wherever there's a blank wall...

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 5 points 8 months ago

Like others said, self signed or internal only domains work. Really though for the minimal cost of generally less than $20/year you can make it a lot easier by just buying a domain.

From a pure security stance it could be argued that a personally owned CA is more secure than any public one since it's possible for others to create a trusted cert with a public entity. Cloudflare ends up doing that for any domains you register with them, but that's really only an issue for things facing the web and using self signed certs will typically cause problems for any pre-compiled client apps you might use.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 15 points 8 months ago (10 children)

I mean it's technically not wrong. I'm 46 was born in 98, also in 88, and 78 as well.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 137 points 8 months ago

I might suggest that the kid got a nicer present in the form of a reason to file suit against the team for the embarrassment and emotional distress. Using the kid for a BS publicity stunt is not acceptable.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 8 months ago

Pretty simple simple 'castle & moat' setup. Lots of firewall, IPS, dynamic threat, etc around it with separate subnets and all the usual biz. My ISP doesn't use CGNAT so I'm lucky that way, though they did question WTF I was doing last I made a service call to them based on the bandwidth usage.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 8 months ago

That's a big part of the appeal of the fediverse for me. Setting up a personal site used to be fairly easy, but was largely isolated and unidirectional. With the AP protocol, and frankly a lot of self-hostable apps in general these days, you can make something to converse with the whole globe and you don't even need to make a big effort to help people find it.

Webrings still exist, but finding them is less than trivial when they get drowned out by the noise of corporate sites. I've used IRC within the last year, but had to look up the proper use of nicserve commands. The old web mentality is still out there, but for the major part people want simplicity. Few want to go through the learning curve to deal with some of the more esoteric parts of it when they can just auth into a site and do a thing.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 9 points 8 months ago

Sounds more like war on a bunch of legacy regulation that needed to be updated requiring their use.

view more: ‹ prev next ›