ShellMonkey

joined 11 months ago
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 1 points 5 months ago

Indeed they do use 11x but it's still a possibility to cause issues. It's entirely possible to manage a fleet of IPs across a net but it takes a solid plan organization plan. My company is big on the acquiring companies game where IP overlaps are a perpetual challenge when merging sites in and you need a mess of snat/dnat conversions to keep routing from getting in a knot.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

While handy on a personal net, on a larger corporate net this isn't practical and even adds a security risk. By having servers request leases you run the chance that someone gets into a segment, funds the ARP association for an IP/MAC combo and can take over a server's spot simply by spoofing their own MAC to match at the time of lease renewal.

In the post above about setting a static address in two spots that in itself isn't required either. So long as there are no duplicates you would just set the static address on the end device, then the network will sort it out with ARP 'who has' requests in local segments, or routing in the case of distinct subnets.

Edit: the duplicate I suppose could be referring to putting names into a DNS registry, in which case yes you would need that double entry, or just reference things by IP if the environment is small enough for it to be practical.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 28 points 5 months ago

He - and if there is a God, I am convinced he is a he, because no woman could or would ever fuck things up this badly.

-George Carlin

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 6 points 5 months ago

I've used plenty of them with no problems for years. Just so long as you have redundancy in place like a good RAID setup there's little risk of losing anything.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I have a genius system quite similar to that from the early 1900s called a laundry chute, but it works on a magic force called gravity rather than hooking up a pneumatic tube like I'm at a bank drive up.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 34 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He's like that over confident political blowhard on the internet who picked up on one term used in policy at some point and tried to wedge it in as the appropriate answer to everything.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 89 points 5 months ago (12 children)

or even hold them in civil contempt of court, which can include jail time

Do it, don't give these ass hats the time to play and see how far they can run, smack them with whatever tools are at your disposal NOW!

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 15 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Did you happen to unplug the external drive when it was moved? Could wonder if the device ID got changed and the server can't find the old location for the library any longer.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Which is exactly why he stuck himself in there.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 45 points 6 months ago

Because scrapping existing things just because they're not a throwback to the old gas guzzler days is surely going to save money and make things great again.

I'm kind of waiting for him to throw out a maximum fuel efficiency standard. You know, get them back to the good ol days of the 1970s 8/mpg Lincoln that weigh 2 tons.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 32 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Conveniently he has a plan to create the XSS that very same year...

view more: ‹ prev next ›