ShellMonkey

joined 10 months ago
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 38 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yet it somehow doesn't strike him as off at all that long standing allies suddenly feel a need to band against us. It's a mystery I say, maybe they just woke up and had a bad morning...

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 8 points 4 months ago

But the man in the telly box dun told me it was gunna make my kids dumb....

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

How many lists get sent with a list of BS names?

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 11 points 4 months ago

I actually got a new one, some random new account with no post history, so either a new bot or someone who just decided I was special.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Too late, it's catchy and it fits. There are leftist spaces here that don't kiss up to autocracies and spread propaganda that nobody has a major problem with.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah, my view is he looks to throw out as much insane bullshit as he can and see what he can make stick.

From his perspective it costs virtually nothing beyond a pen and paper, and it either wastes a bunch of resources and time for opposition, or he gets what he wants if it goes unopposed, basically win/win for $0.

How to stop him is another matter, but ones like this 'should' be easy wins.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 4 months ago

Half the things these folks try and do they don't actually have the ability to. For a lot of it it's distraction to keep people spending time and money in court while they pillage and plunder.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 7 points 4 months ago

They only want less government in regulation of businesses to make easier and more profitable to plunder society.

Otherwise they're all over the idea of telling people what to do or think or who to worship, etc.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 51 points 4 months ago (3 children)

By its terms, Article I, Section 4, Clause 1, referred to as the Elections Clause, contemplates that state legislatures will establish the times, places, and manner of holding elections for the House of Representatives and the Senate, subject to Congress making or altering such state regulations (except as to the place of choosing Senators).1 The Supreme Court has interpreted the Elections Clause expansively, enabling states "to provide a complete code for congressional elections, not only as to times and places, but in relation to notices, registration, supervision of voting, protection of voters, prevention of fraud and corrupt practices, counting of votes, duties of inspectors and canvassers, and making and publication of election returns."2

IANAL: This sounds like more grandstanding to appease his cult sure to be challenged.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 28 points 4 months ago (6 children)

At which point there are no federal laws and the country dissolves into feudal fiefdoms.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's impressive and somewhat concerning what people will pay for a name. Historic as it is Napster died long long ago

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How do critters like this even sustain their bodies? Are their blood and nervous systems transparent too?

view more: ‹ prev next ›