When Red Green gets into consumer electronics...
ShellMonkey
joined 10 months ago
So much red in that post history... This is not the place for you.
We got our share of crazies, but they might bring you a casserole after calling you a dumbass.
Stop selling disposable vapes, this is not complicated. I've since stopped but first encountered vapes back when they called it e-smoking and the devices where really crude. After a few years they finally got something decently reliable and reusable down and people had their personal device.
I'm not even sure when disposables became a thing but the notion of use one and discard electronics is nuts. The whole industry could do well to come up with some standards so you don't have to search out some specific model of atomizer to fit a certain piece, but it's not impossible.
Pretty sure that's the express goal with all the protests and the burning cars and the like.
When I think on it though, given his personality this comment is probably just a big FU to the protesting public, "See? You can't stop me, I still have hundreds of billions and will fuck things up at will."
Glad to know that GS is catching up with every other financial advisor and most of the logical everyday people who understand that making things more expensive tends to make people's financial situation worse.
A good backstop, just being one who's read a pile of weasel worded legal docs I could see someone argue that the parameters to 'be' president (right age, natural born citizen) are distinct from the ability to be 'elected' president, but that's the kind of shifty logic I could see the SCOTUS using to allow it.
Source on that one? Would be glad to see it but so far as I know there are listed requirements for president but not VP. My thinking is the phrasing about 'be elected' as a technicality.
Built up tolerance, just keep an eye on the rest of the monkeys in the admin though for any strange or inexplicable behavior.
I hear Pete Hegseth started a drinking game based around every time Trump says the word tariff.
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
It occured to me in another thread that from my non lawyer reading of the amendment that it doesn't exactly say 'can not become president for a 3rd term by succession if the elected president resigns'. It's a scary thought but his cult would probably go for it to elect some sycophant on the promise they resign day one with Donnie as VP.
Not at all, but one of my grandmother's came from Iowa so we used the two interchangeably pretty much.