SheeEttin

joined 2 years ago
[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, I understand there are orders of magnitude of complexity between the two. And no, it's not remotely feasible, like I said, they wouldn't be any good. If anything, I'm agreeing with you that no system of government, or system of economics for that matter, would make it practical.

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backyard_furnace

It's a parallel. Mao tried to create industry in people's backyards. It took people away from food production, destroyed existing valuable metal products, deforested the areas, and for all that effort, resulted in product with quality so bad it was unusable.

While it would probably also be more like input material production, silicon ingots and wafer slicing and such, I'm sure the quality would equally be shit enough to be unusable. Especially since metalwork tolerances are usually in micrometers at best, but microchips are in the nanometers.

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Communist China and Soviet Russia would do it.

They wouldn't be any good, but they'd do it.

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

They absolutely do fund development like this. But they keep it for themselves until such time that it no longer gives them a competitive edge.

For example, when the US sells tanks or planes to other countries, those export versions have much less fancy equipment on the inside. Or in pure science like cryptography, you can assume that when the NSA publicly approves of an algorithm, they're confident that they can break it if they really need to (either because they inserted a backdoor, have identified a weakness they can exploit, or just have no use for it any more themselves).

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago

I think most people will continue to just use their smartphone and get a Fairphone or something if it matters to them.

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Music in particular can be described the most mathematically. Personally, I think it's fascinating.

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

In a way, we have. There is already ML-generated music. It doesn't sound bad, just boring and all the tracks sound the same.

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Sure. And the number of people who would do it purely because they want to is a tiny fraction of people who do it for pay. To pay those people you need profits, to get profits you need to be special, to be special you can't share your trade secrets.

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

The distro itself? Idk I usually just write an ansible playbook to get everything to my liking. Run it once on a new install and everything is good.

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

I assume there was, as modern freezers have built-in alarms, but I don't see any mention in the article.

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah. For persistence and cross-device stuff, it makes more sense for it to be stored server-side. Either by the app author, or maybe Google could offer a few kB free for each app, like how Chrome provides a bit of storage for extension settings.

[–] SheeEttin@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You ever seen a phone at 0%?

view more: ‹ prev next ›