ShaunaTheDead

joined 2 years ago
[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Oh yeah I forgot about the teen numbers, but yeah still applies.

[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I wonder if others have some favourite posters that you they quite often?

For me, it's @Stamets and ThePicardManuever but I've noticed a couple other prominent posters lately although their names haven't stuck for me just yet.

[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Just so this discussion doesn't devolve the same way, odd numbers are numbers that can't be evenly divided by 2. So the only numbers that can be odd will all end in 1, 3, 5, 7, or 9 - or "one", "three", "five", "seven", or "nine" all of which have an "e" in them.

[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Christmas is basically a secular holiday for a lot of people these days anyway, but if optics really matter to you, just call it "Yule" or something.

[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A lot of it is also tied up with religion. Flat Earthers, for example, started by trying to reconcile biblical explanations of the Earth and the universe and it spiraled from there.

[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 61 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

It's not exactly a misconception that I've ever really held, but I absolutely hate the lazy writing trope in TV/film where hitting someone over the head and knocking them out is used so commonly and casually and there are never any repercussions.

In reality, if you get hit on the head hard enough that you lose consciousness for any length of time, you're almost certainly going to suffer very serious brain damage. If you wake up at all - yes, it's quite possible you'd die from this - then you're going to have a major concussion, a huge headache, and probably a fracture in your skull and your brain will be swelling up inside your skull. It's a VERY serious injury, and yet it's just played off as this casual thing on TV and I think it's incredibly dangerous how casually it's depicted.

[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

I do understand that, I think you're missing something here. I said "Yes, the individual should try to shift their behaviour", so yeah I agree with you. What I'm saying is that lobbyists for the ultra wealthy try to shift all of the guilt and blame onto the individual as a distraction from more important causes.

[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Blaming the behaviour of individual people is a strategy employed by the oil industry to shift the blame. I wonder who's funding these scientists... Yes, the individual should try to shift their behaviour, but claiming the majority of the blame rests on each of us is nonsense when the richest 1% of people are responsible for more emissions than the poorest 50% of people is pretty disingenuous if you ask me.

[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

Pretty sure it's this: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/24157-vaginal-ring

Awesome invention btw! Pretty much birth control pills and IUDs combined into one easy to self insert package.

So add "preventing unwanted pregnancies" to the list of powers the one ring can provide you, thanks Sauron!

[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (6 children)

“These oddities keep getting swept under the rug, but the more we find, we’re going to have to come face-to-face with the fact that maybe our standard model needs rethinking,” said Lopez. “As a minimum it’s incomplete. As a maximum we need a completely new theorem of cosmology.”

I find this line really funny. Anyone familiar with cosmology knows that most cosmologists agree that our current models are lacking. After all, that's what dark matter and dark energy are, unknown variables in the current cosmological model. It seems odd to me then that they're acting as though they're a minority when most cosmologists agree, it's just that the current model is the best one we have, so if you don't want it "swept under the rug" then don't just prove the old model wrong, make a new model that fits every observation.

view more: ‹ prev next ›