ShaggySnacks

joined 2 years ago
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Seeing at how incompetent DOGE was. This is totally plausible.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm fairly sure that only people that use Lemmy are: communist trans women that are Linux aficionados. They may or may have also dabbled in being a femboy and being a furry.

Joking aside, it's time to get serious.

Dear Men,

If you a man who understands why women need to feel space. This comment isn't for you. Feel free to upvote me and downvote all my enemies.

When women (cis and trans) don't feel safe they leave spaces. This also applies to men too. No one wants to be somewhere were they don't feel safe. When a bunch of women leave that means the ratio of men to women goes higher until critical mass of all men and no women. When that happens, we have what is called a "sausage party". Now some men would love a sausage party. Ask yourself, do you want a sausage party?

If no, stop getting your balls in a twist. WomensStuff is not hurting anyone, they're not going out brigarding or harassing or picking fights with other people. All users of WomensStuff want is a place where they can get together and talk about things that matter to them. If women feel safe on Lemmy, you don't get a sausage party. There is also the risk of scaring off all the wonderful original women content creators of Lemmy NSFW. The fact is women are awesome and there should be more of them.

Now, if you want a sausage party and recognizance that women are people who deserve to feel safe. You can create your own sausage party community. You do you.

Now, if you want don't want/want sausage party and are toxic asshole. Go start your own instance, where you all can circle jerk each other while complaining why women don't want to be around you. Hopefully, one day you'll come to the realization the reason why women don't want to be around you is because your asshole. With that realization you'll come to the conclusion that women want to feel safe in a world that doesn't allow them that freedom.

Cause at the end of the day, WomensStuff **DOES NOT AFFECT YOUR LIFE IN ANY MEANINGFUL WAY. ** Go be angry at the slow stripping of rights of anyone who isn't a white male. Or how major countries are taking their sweet ass time to recognizance the Israel is committing genocide. Or that the rich keep getting richer while the rest of us worse off each year. Or how global climate change is going to end us as a species. If you have the time and energy to get mad at small community on Lemmy, you're life is fucking easy.

Sincerely,

Me

Which ever outlet that allows me to stick a fork in them.

Who knew sharks were nosy fuckers.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The spray tan still makes Trumpy look like a ghoul.

Scots hate living in Scotland; they only live there out of spite to the English.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Don’t forget ad companies! Those ad companies love a squeaky clean, family fun internet.

Weird. This sound awfully like fraud. Cause if I was tell companies to bogus charges, I would get charged.

What, we all should do is incorporate and use corporations to scam other corporations. It's just a civil matter than.

I told Steam that I was born in 1900.

Judiciary Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) named a fake rule that made everything Bove has said at the DOJ fall under some kind of privilege. Democrats hammered Grassley on it, but it went ignored.

Atwater: Y'all don't quote me on this. You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger."

Collective Shout is following this with some modifications. You can't come out an say "we want to ban LGBT content". Collective Shout starts with banning inceset and rape games cause who's going to stand against that? Then it's all about perverts (with no definition of what makes someone a pervert) and protecting children from perverts. All the way talking about what makes a women, women (Hint: Does not include trans-women).

It's why conseratives are in favor of bathroom bills, ID and birth names, and other anti-trans law.

For people like us, it's glaring obvious what Collective Shout is up too however the average person doesn't.

 

The Zombies - Beechwood Park has the lyrics:

All the roads in my mind

Junk Science - "Roads" has the lyrics:

Roads, we don't need none of those

 

VHS tapes are a horror trope now.

 
 
 

This week, the prime minister is in Italy breaking bread with Giorgia Meloni, a leader who came to power at the head of a party built in the aftermath of World War II to maintain the legacy of Benito Mussolini and Italian fascism. Starmer says he wants to learn from and cooperate with Meloni’s approach to migration.

It gets worse. Starmer and his foreign secretary, David Lammy, have also signaled that they will look to European arrangements with Libya and Syria for inspiration.

The promise of social democrats and liberals was that they would restore decency to politics, not take policy tips from far-right governments. Rather than repeating the previous government’s strategy of migrant-baiting and brutality — which was a factor in mobs attempting to burn down people seeking asylum only weeks ago — Starmer should use his majority to chart a different course: one that meets our obligations to protect, rather than harm, people seeking safety and does not attempt to divide us by where we were born.

 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›