ShadowRam

joined 2 years ago
[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

It's a link directly to where they are published?

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

I'm confused,

It's a direct link to printables that hosts the files?

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What?

What does Radar have anything to do with Lidar?

They are completely in different EM spectrums.

Also modern LIDAR is keyed in a way that LIDAR systems can't interfere with other LIDAR systems.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

won’t add much to an existing array of visible spectrum cameras.

You do realize LIDAR is just a camera, but has an accurate distance per pixel right?

It absolutely adds everything.

But its surroundings are reliably captured by functional sensors

No it's not. That's the point. LIDAR is the functional sensor required.

You can not rely on stereoscopic camera's.
The resolution of distance is not there.
It's not there for humans.
It's not there for the simple reason of physics.

Unless you spread those camera's out to a width that's impractical, and even then it STILL wouldn't be as accurate as LIDAR.

You are more then welcome to try it yourself.
You can be even as stupid as Elon and dump money and rep into thinking that it's easier or cheaper without LIDAR.

It doesn't work, and it'll never work as good as a LIDAR system.
Stereoscopic Camera's will always be more expensive than LIDAR from a computational standpoint.

AI will do a hell of a lot better recognizing things via a LIDAR Camera than a Stereoscopic Camera.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

challenges in self driving are not with data acquisition.

What?!?! Of course it is.

We can already run all this shit through a simulator and it works great, but that's because the computer knows the exact position, orientation, velocity of every object in a scene.

In the real world, the underlying problem is the computer doesn't know what's around it, and what those things around doing or going to do.

It's 100% a data acquisition problem.

Source? I do autonomous vehicle control for a living. In environments much more complicated than a paved road with accepted set rules.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

You need to dial up the linear advance just a hair to fix the bulging corners.

And you do look like your over-extruding by a hair as well.

Print a solid 20mm cube, 1 perimeter, 0% infill, 0 top layers.

It will print out a cube you can measure the wall thickness with a dial caliper.

The thickness should exactly match your extrusion width setting. If it does not, adjust your extrusion multiplier be how much your measurement is out.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do you have lidar on your head?

Nope,

And that's exactly why humans crash. Constantly.

Even when paying attention.

They don't have resolution in depth perception, nor the FOV.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I'm not totally convinced he's dead.
This looks too staged. You don't get to the top of a merc group like that by making dumb mistakes like this.

Then again, who the fucks knows. Maybe you do in Russia.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I'm not the individual who created this item. I just shared it.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 77 points 2 years ago (51 children)

Without LIDAR, this is a fool's endeavor.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

Now dude gets to go retire somewhere else, everyone will think he's dead.

view more: ‹ prev next ›