SeventyTwoTrillion

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

Here's two pieces that describe and explain the current state of the Chinese economy. I strongly encourage you to read it. It's very good.

Orikron:

expand

A new Bloomberg article has insightfully broken down China's strategy to go well above middle-income status, avoid technological blockades, proceed with high-tech industrial upgrades and take center-stage in the World Economy while completely refuting the Neoliberal Orthodoxy in the process.

As is well known by now, China has consciously and intentionally deflated its Property Sector and non-productive service industries such as Private Tutoring and Gaming; and has funneled that credit toward Industrial development. The consequences of this are astounding. China's surplus of manufactured goods relative to global GDP is now 2%, a level unseen since the US after World War II, when all Europe and Japan lay in ruins. But, unlike wartime destruction, the de-industrialization of the West was entirely self-inflicted. It sought to alleviate (or do away with) the social and economic pressures of a highly organized and politically conscious working class by exporting industrial manufacturing and the contradictions that come with it.

As a consequence, Bloomberg estimates that 45% of China's gargantuan manufacturing output (now accounting for more than 1/3rd of global value-added) is exported. But we have long since passed the era of cheap Chinese toys and clothes. China is now competing for the whole cake and biting the heels of Germany, South Korea and Japan, cutting into the they have historically held against China due to their essential provision of hi-tech components that China was unable to make by itself. But that reality has changed. China's large-scale campaign of industrial upgrading is already bearing fruit. This can be seen by the massive trend toward robotization. China's manufacturing industry is now more automated than Sweden, America or Switzerland's and it will soon surpass (or has already surpassed) Japan and Germany, leaving only south Korea (and the much smaller Singapore; not listed in the chart) as competition.

Despite all the talk of "China's economic slowdown", there is one metric that doesn't lie: commodity prices (in the sense of raw materials and basic goods) as they are actively increasing, despite the slowdown in Real Estate construction; China's New industrial campaign is more than making up for that lost demand, although its further evidence will not be short-term bursts of double-digit growth, but a long structural trend toward high-quality, medium-speed growth. In short, there will be no Japanization. Instead, Arthur Kroeber of Gavekal Dragonomics uses the amusing but apt term of a "Leninist Germany"; although with China we speak of a "Germany" with 17 times the population, or more than the entire Developed World combined.

China is thus defying the neoliberal doctrine of an ever-expanding Service sector. In its latest Five-Year Plan, it has stated in no uncertain terms than from 2020 onward, the share of GDP represented by manufacturing will not be allowed to decrease, and has since risen to 28% from a 26% low. Additionally, China is challenging another neoliberal orthodoxy: hierarchical value chains. It seeks to become industrially self-sufficient; it will not let go of lower-end industries entirely and rely on Africa or Southeast Asia the way the West has relied on China. Xi and the current generation of leadership understand that his path is not only treacherous to economic and national security but would carry with it massive social challenges linked to destruction of livelihoods. Furthermore, it is unnecessary. 1/5th of the world population with ever-increasing degrees of education and automation need not rely on the exploitation of the cheap labor of others. This is the underlying reason for the massive push toward robotization. "To build a complete supply chain" as Damien Ma puts it.

According to China Briefing, China is the only country that possesses all the industrial categories in the UN's industrial classification. Here we see a reflection of an unavoidable fact: China is an entirely different kind of power. There is zero precedent for a civilization-state who strives for a simultaneously major presence in the World Economy (external circulation) and a complete domestic industrial supply chain at the cutting edge of technological and industrial development (internal circulation) but this is what is entailed by the Dual Circulation policy and the shift toward Domestic Demand, Manufacturing and New Energy industries as the mainstay of Chinese economic development over the coming years. The political-economic uniqueness of this will strike many as novel, particularly those few but annoying voices on the "Left" that seek to draw parallels between China's rise and that of the Imperialist West.

Instead, one of the major contradictions will be between the declining, post-industrial West as it seeks to hold onto its hegemonic position at the top of global supply chains (it has already completely lost in areas such as EV manufacturing, Solar Panels, etc...) by blocking China from competing in our own markets, after decades of our companies' access to theirs. This will be one last attempt at choking out China and its ability to bring 1.4 billion people into the Developed World, thus doubling its population. It is a class struggle on a civilizational scale. Such renewed Trade Wars -- with possible proxy military fronts if a more hawkish leadership takes hold of the reigns of government in the US -- would inevitably require China to re-focus more heavily on domestic-demand-driven industrialization, a somewhat slower path to deal with industrial overcapacity, but this too would have positive long-term effects on China by forcing an even faster rise in Chinese incomes.

Its bet on manufacturing is a sure-fire way to preserve long-term economic and social stability. Bloomberg points out that: "A 2017 study published by Singapore’s Ministry of Trade and Industry found every 100 new manufacturing jobs are associated with 27 new non-manufacturing jobs; by contrast, every 100 new service jobs are associated with only 3 additional manufacturing jobs. It also has the highest innovation potential, accounts for the bulk of economy-wide R&D spending and employs the majority of scientists and engineers."

Fundamentally, the Real Economy will always triumph over the Virtual. China understands this and, unlike the West, already has a highly competent political system with an advanced class character capable of handling the challenge of building a new energy-based industrial modernity on a scale only comparable to the rise of the West and its offshoots; but in a span of 50, not 500 years. These political-economic changes are bound to shake up the global chessboard and, as I've pointed out in previous posts, already are from Novorossiya to Palestine to Myanmar. But we can only have a solid grasp of these geopolitical outbursts if we understand their geoeconomic foundations.

[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'll probably make it next week's COTW. I was considering either Ethiopia, Chad, or South Africa for the African pick, and I was just like "There's some interesting/tragic stuff going on in Chad but I just don't know enough about it; I don't think the ICJ genocide case will result in much; and at least Ethiopia is relatively regionally relevant being both a new BRICS member and pretty close to the Red Sea (which is a trend one might notice a trend with all these five new additions)

Of the five new members, Ethiopia is the one I know least about. Iran is obviously its own thing, great anti-imperialist force with some internal issues due to sanctions and western intelligence pressure. The UAE is obviously a gulf monarchy oil hellscape, as is Saudi Arabia. Egypt is a can of worms with the comprador Sisi there, but with key control over the Suez Canal, and their economy is doing pretty badly. But Ethiopia? I know that the GERD is a thing, I know of the Meneliks and not much beyond that, I know their geography (the famous highlands and the rift valley there), and... uh... that's basically it.

[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There won't be a third set of institutions.

I was thinking along the lines of the African Union (or some other alternative to it), or regional organizations (like a less shitty version of ECOWAS or CARICOM). Obviously you could have both a hypothetical BRICS+ alternative to the IMF (which the NDB is still far from being, of course) and regional organizations, it's just that I think that degree to which power is distributed between them in a more multipolar arrangement would change based on these kinds of decisions as they come along in the years to come.

Like, "Oh, China has our backs in our dislike of Israel so we feel fine giving them observer status/doing more deals with us/etc in our new regional organization" vs "China is just abstaining (or even voted down) on this critical issue, so while we still oppose the hegemonic US more, we want more regional power that is less influenced by countries that don't share our views."

In any case, the initial trial would be to see if there is a plausible case for genocide not to see if Israel has committed genocide.

Fair enough.

[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 33 points 2 years ago (9 children)

I've of the opinion that the ICJ case won't get the required votes, but it's kinda whatever regardless. Like:

  1. ICJ gets the required votes. Israel will have "officially" committed genocide. Nothing happens. China and Russia establish themselves as the leaders of the periphery.

  2. ICJ doesn't get the required votes. Israel will not have "officially" committed genocide. Nothing happens. China and Russia will have degraded their popularity in countries with significant Muslim populations, but the alternative is the United States. Further worldwide disbelief in the power and validity of global institutions, accelerating the decline of Western hegemony.

This whole thing is gonna be won on the battlefield, not the courts. It's basically just a test to see how serious Russia and China truly are at this point, and thus to what extent developing countries will need to form their own institutions independent of both the United States and Russia/China.

[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 34 points 2 years ago

The weekly update ain't here. I'm going to be honest, though: not a shitload has really been happening. The reason why I stopped doing daily briefings after Tuesday last week wasn't exhaustion, but because I had like, at best, 3-4 articles of any interest to share on any given day.

--

The Country of the Week is Ethiopia!

As mentioned in the preamble, feel free to post or recommend any material related to Ethiopia, whether from a thousand years ago or yesterday. You can post it anywhere in the thread, but you can also reply to this comment if you wish.

If you're feeling particularly ambitious and want homework, you could take on any or all of these questions (no reward, but I'll be very proud of you):

  • Who are the main political actors? Are they compradors, nationalists, international socialists, something else?
  • What are the most salient domestic political issues; those issues that repeatedly shape elections over the last 10, 20 years. Every country has its quirks that complicate analysis - for example, Brexit in the UK.
  • What is the country's history? You don't have to go back a thousand years if that's not relevant, and I'm counting "history" as basically anything that has happened over a year ago.
  • What factions exist, historically and currently? If there is an electoral system, what are the major parties and their demographic bases? Are there any minor parties with large amounts of influence? Independence movements? Religious groups?
  • How socially progressive or conservative are they? Is there equality for different ethnic groups, or are some persecuted? Do they have LGBTQIA+ rights? Have they improved over time, or gotten worse?
  • What role do foreign powers play in the country’s politics and economy? Is there a particular country nearby or far away that is nearly inseparable from them, for good or bad reasons? Is their trade dominated by exports/imports to one place? Are they exploited, exploiters, or something in between?
  • If applicable, what is the influence of former colonial relationships on the modern economy and politics?
  • Is the country generally stable? Do you think there will be a coup at some point in the future, and if so, what faction might replace them?

The previous country was Haiti.

This is our Geopolitics Reading List so far! Please chime in with suggestions!

General Theory:

Canada:

Chile:

  • 1000 Days of Revolution: Chilean Communists on the Lessons of Popular Unity (I cannot personally find an online version).
  • Santiago Boys Podcast, analyzing Allende's government and Cybersyn.

Lebanon:

United States:

Venezuela:

[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

It's alright. I prefer doing a lot of reading all at once as that's what I find it easiest to put in my schedule, rather than actually doing 6-7 pages every day and then putting the book down again. So perhaps that will also work out for you.

Even in the worst case scenario, you can just start reading whenever it's convenient for you (whether that's in a week or in six months) and you'll have the threads to look back on at least. If anybody right now is like "god damn it, I'm behind like 20 pages now and it's just gonna get worse and I can't catch up and--" then that is your brain tricking you, as the reading is challenging and it might not wanna do it. You can in fact do it and you don't have to "give up" and try again a year from now when the threads reset - you can just postpone it a few weeks or months for when you're in a better/less busy space. And think about how great it will feel at the end when you have actually read and (hopefully) understood Capital and have become an undisputed Marxist, no ifs, ands, or buts!

[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago

gone but not forgotten sad-boi

feels a lot like "this is the first time in my entire life that I've had an opinion that differs from the fascist state propaganda line and so am extremely confused about how to even formulate what I want, so right now I'm just limited to the ideological and mental tools at my disposal"

vaguely similar to Russian peasants protesting outside of the Tsar's residence due to difficult conditions, but phrased like "Oh, our lovely father, our great ruler, please save us from these terrible things that are happening!" when those terrible things are happening because of the Tsar's actions (or at least he isn't doing anything to mitigate them). they might get to something meaningful eventually. they also might not, and have to have a Palestinian state forced upon them at gunpoint.

[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

FAIR: Media Obsession With Inflation Has Manufactured Discontent

2023 is over, and with it, the great inflation surge of the last few years has essentially come to an end. As the progressive economist Dean Baker trumpeted shortly before Christmas, “This Economy Has Landed, We Are at the Fed’s Target” (Beat the Press, 12/22/23). Inflation is now at 2.6%, according to the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure, and is trending further downward. Remarkably, since the Fed began raising interest rates in the spring of 2022, unemployment has maintained a historically low level of below 4%.

Contrast that with the US’s last experience with an extended period of elevated inflation. That was the double-digit inflation of the late 1970s/early 1980s, which the Fed fought by sending unemployment skyrocketing—from 6% in 1979 to a peak of nearly 11% in 1982. With inflation tamed in the fall of 1984—down to 4.3%—President Ronald Reagan declared “Morning in America.” At the time, the misery index, a rough gauge of societal suffering that sums inflation and unemployment, clocked in at nearly 12%. Today, the same index sits around 7%. If the fall of 1984 was morning, we’re well into the day. The dark, turbulent night is not only behind us; it’s been over for a while.

That’s not how most of the American public seems to feel, though. People continue to rate the economy stunningly poorly, given its performance of late. The University of Michigan’s Index of Consumer Sentiment, for instance, most recently registered 61.3, versus 100.9 during “Morning in America.” In other words, consumer sentiment is currently 39% lower than it was at a time when the misery index was 41% higher. Meanwhile, Joe Biden has a lower approval rating than any president going back to Jimmy Carter at the equivalent stage of their presidencies (New York Times, 12/28/23). Biden is, in fact, 15 percentage points lower than Reagan, whose economy at the same period of his presidency was, in key respects, significantly worse—unemployment, for instance, was 8.3%.

...

... there’s another fundamental cause of economic discontent that should be getting more attention: corporate media’s single-minded obsession with inflation, which has left the public with an objectively inaccurate view of the economy.

FAIR has stepped up to the batting plate with their own possible explanation for why everybody hates the economy despite macroeconomic indicators being so positive - that the media has been too negative about the economy and so everybody is just seeing that analysis and going "Huh, the economy must suck even if my life personally is fine." A swing and a very large miss for FAIR.

But how could this discontent possibly be?! We have done the soft landing! Inflation is way down! Look at our GDP! Idiotic. Inventing macroeconomic figures to quell the misery index will not actually make the underlying problems go away. So now we're in a situation where the actual state of the economy isn't being measured, causing immense confusion for navel-gazing dipshit economists.

The US economy does, in fact, very much fucking suck if you aren't in the top 1-10%. Student loan repayments restarted in October. Fake job listings are inflating the figures. Delinquency rates are at their highest level in almost 30 years. 12.8% of American households were food insecure in 2022, up from 10.2% in 2021. In early 2023, there were record levels of food bank usage despite record low unemployment. US life expectancy is declining. The impact of letting coronavirus rip through the population continues to work in the background. Despite all the hopes, AI almost certainly will not deliver the bourgeoisie to the new promised land of high productivity, as the crisis there continues. Some states are trying to reintroduce child labor.

US Gross Domestic Income has been stagnant since October 2022. US manufacturing PMIs also haven't been positive since October 2022. It's been over a year straight of decline. The post-pandemic boost is well behind us. The US economy is being supported by marginal expansions in services PMI, with the composite coming at 50.9 for December 2023, or 0.9 above stagnation. The services PMI is being supported by healthcare, education, and technology - the last of which received major subsidies due to the Inflation Reduction Act and the Chips and Science Act. The most high-tech sectors are growing, but everything more fundamental is mired in the longest continuous slump in two decades. Non-financial sector corporate profits are falling.

All of this, while the US has been manipulating its vassals to try and get them the best possible economy. They started a war with Russia and then blew up Nord Stream to weaken Europe and force them to buy more energy and goods from the US. They are trying to isolate China via protectionist sanctions designed to boost the US economy instead. All of this warmongering and blood, and it gets the US an economy that is, if you're being very optimistic, merely stagnating (and in actuality is declining).

You know what hasn't declined? The stock market, which is at all-time record levels.

#Tradle #672 3/6
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
https://oec.world/en/tradle

spoilerone day, I will be able to distinguish the eastern European economies. not today, but one day.

view more: ‹ prev next ›