Sentau

joined 2 years ago
[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago

Neither of them is trying to model the universe (that is the purview of cosmology). We are trying to model very particular phenomenon happening in the universe and there is no reason to expect them to modeled using the mathematical structure. The fact that they are is very fascinating.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Crazy thing is very similar mathematical structures is used to define the behavior of a single particle in QFT and of a huge collection of particles in condensed matter physics

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

https://archive.ph/FK3Ub

Archived link to bypass paywall

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago

Why are they not armoured¿?

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

This is one of the greatest unexpected responses I have seen

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Entirely possible

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know if that would be possible with SoCs. I think if you were able to create a design where the whole SoC was upgraded, that would be more likely to exist.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Doesn't help that the date based release looks a lot like semantic versioning which a confusing a lot of people. Should've just used Ubuntu's standard of 'yy.mm' instead of 'yy.m'

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Well I think it should be a single 0 because Ubuntu's naming has now established the standard that if the second part of the name suggests month, it is written using two numbers eg 23.10, 24.04, etc. 10 is used for October and 04 is used for April.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They aren't using semantic numbering though. They using 'yy.m.patch' instead of 'yy.mm.patch' as the scheme so it looks like semantic without being semantic which is causing all the confusion. The next release is shown as 24.8

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah you are right. For some reason I thought I had seen 24.1 but i was mistaken. Stupid naming scheme this since 24.2 and 24.8 sound like v2 and v8 of the 24.x release. Should have just used 24.mm just like the rest of the foss world does and as you suggested it should be

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Wait doesn't ublue have the gnome apps installed as flatpaks¿? I have always rebased silverblue to ublue because I have had trouble with the ublue installer - some efi issues in grub

view more: ‹ prev next ›