If I remember correctly, the gen 1 kona electric had no inbuilt internet connectivity (atleast in the Indian model). Maybe you can see if that is true for your region
Sentau
joined 2 years ago
Dude if you are able to use arch without difficulties, you can use ubuntu or fedora as well without any issues. And arch should have good support for asus-kernel and nvidia drivers through pre compiled binaries so even if you stick with arch, it won't be an issue
Could be because African teams are more likely to employ coaches from other nationalities? Here in Asia(southeast and middle East, China), I have seen that there is a preference to employ foreign coaches (from Europe mostly) because it is thought that they have better game knowledge and experience. Maybe FAs in Africa have a similar thought process
Edit : I misunderstood the comment i was replying to. That was comment was about the number of times African Cup has been held. As leclerc would say - I am stupid
A far better option will be the 1st gen hyundai kona electric (2018 model i think). If memory serves me right, the 1st gen did not have connected tech features because it had no inbuilt connectivity. It is also a proper modern EV with a ~40kWh and 64kWh battery options which will give much more usable range (200-400km depending on the battery size and usage pattern)
So my suspicion that the 'efficiency' of shots has gone up with the introduction of data analysis seems to be true. I just hope that we don't completely lose worldies from outside the box in a decade or two
The original article didn't have that plotted, but I don't see why it wouldn't follow this line fairly closely.
Well my logic is that long shoots were always low xG attempts so even when players were attempting more long shots, the goals were originating mostly from shots inside the box. Since it is only long shots that have decreased in number, I expect the average distance of a shot resulting in a goal to hardly see any decrease
Has the average distance of shots resulting in a goal also decreased.
I think you're spot on with the cost cap.
Driver salaries aren't part of the cost cap. My guess is that the reason we are seeing rookies is because they are pretty good(Antonelli, Bearman, Lawson, Colapinto, Doohan, potentially Bortoleto) and because the existing guard have been poor(sargeant, Riccardo, Magnussen, zhou along with bottas being a victim of his shitty car). Rookies adoption was also stymied by the fact that the 2019 and 2020 f2 lineup were pretty weak overall. Tsunoda is the best talent I can remember and even he is at an average level on the current grid
A different kind of steel rain.
Poor management. Bad coaching. Apathetic players.
Well my comment was not about having control over the software/firmware though that will be cool.
My logic is that well tested, polished software/firmware have very few bugs and hence most of the updates they get are feature additions or improvements to current functionality (examples in an EV could be updates making the BMS more robust, tweaking the regen modes according to feedback from the users, etc). Poorly tested, half baked software/firmware will be full of bugs and broken functionality and will lead to 'updates' where all the changes are correcting broken functionality and serious bugs. This will be an unpleasant experience for the user and we should hold companies accountable when they do shit like this
The problem isn't the potential usefulness of AI, it is the fact that everything related to AI is being massively overvalued resulting in a 'AI bubble'. It is similar to the dot.com bubble. Doesn't mean AI will disappear when the bubble burst, just that the valur of software and services with AI in them will normalize (like how the internet didn't disappear with the dot.com crash, just the valuation of software and services using the internet came back to what could be considered normal)