There's a black hole sized gulf between "perhaps there is a reason for homosexuality" and "homosexuality is caused by Teflon and micro plastics"
If you aren't going to even attempt to point at something that even comes close to backing up your claim then you're going to be very disappointed with the amount of people who take you seriously.
Jubilee got that omega glow up when they switched her to dazzler, but yeah OG jubilee was meh, power wise
Im honestly not 100% on this but isn't her core power set the draining ability.
Iirc the flight,durability and super strength come from another lady who she nearly killed by accident, ended up with them permanently and that added to her general "can't touch, people die" trauma
Edit : nvm just saw the captain marvel reference, not sure how I missed that the first time
i agree, but i don't want to.
To admit that you’re wrong would be to admit that your view is the weaker one.
Perhaps I'm playing in to the scenario OP is describing but I'd argue that being wrong (let's assume for this example it's provably, objectively wrong) isn't necessarily weakness, sometimes it's just incorrectness.
i'm possibly drawing a pedantic line between weakness (a potentially valid, but weaker argument) vs incorrectness ( an argument that is provably, objectively incorrect ).
Perhaps i'm just describing the difference between subjective and objective arguments ... hmmm, not sure
I think it sometimes depends on how much they have internalised their perspective on a topic as a core part of their personality.
If they perceive a disagreement with their perspective as a direct attack on their person, that can lead to subjectively bad outcomes.
There is also the possibility that what you see as a small point is a critical point to them.
Which law? in which place? at what time ?
Where it's hosted? where it's being accessed? the intermediate locations ?
Which license, is the license enforceable in this context? who decides if it is? what if there are conflicting decisions from different applications of law, who arbitrates?
Do you mean piracy in the maritime sense? or do you mean copyright infringement? perhaps trademark infringement? or intellectual property theft? based on which law in which geographic region ?
This isn't even hyperbole, the things you are talking about have nuance and context, pretending they don't is a failure of imagination or intentional trolling.
The law is the law in the very specific contexts in which it applies and is heavily open to interpretation and bias, which is (in theory) why trials and lawsuits exist.
Not an adherent of the six I's i see
So I gave you two examples that match your criteria and you still can't figure it out. Got it.
...or ..perhaps you did figure it out ..and have moved the goalposts again.. dammit , can't believe I fell for that, congratulations.
Why would you put "by definition" in there, that changes it from a "this is my opinion" to "It are a fact, i know because of my learnings".
It's possible there is a definition somewhere that specifically references mental health i suppose , i'd be interested to see it if you have a link ?