Seminar2250

university where the professor physically threatened me and plagiarized my work called to ask if i was willing to teach a notoriously hard computer science class (that i have taught before to stellar evals as a phd student^[evals are bullshit for measuring how well students actually learn anything, but are great for measuring the stupid shit business idiots love, like whether students will keep paying tuition. also they can be used to explain the pitfalls of using likert scales carelessly, as business idiots do.]). but they had to tell me that i was their last choice because they couldn't find a full professor to teach it (since i didn't finish my phd there because of said abusive professor). on top of that, they offered me a measly $6,000 usd for the entire semester with no benefits, and i would have to pay $500 for parking.

should i just be done with academia? enrollment deadlines for the spring are approaching and i'm wondering if i should just find a "regular job", rather than finishing a PhD elsewhere, especially given the direction higher ed is going in the us.

this is going to take up the rest of my evening, now i'm reading about the Pólya conjecture for the first time

this rules 💗

what worked for me teaching an undergrad course last year was to have

• in-class exams weigh 90% of the total grade, but let them drop their lowest score
• take-home work weigh 10% and be graded on completion (which i announced to the class, of course)
  • i was also diligent about posting solutions (sometimes before the due date

it's a completion grade after all) and i let students know that if they wanted direct feedback they could bring their solutions to office hours

it ended up working pretty well. an added benefit was that my TAs didn't have to deal with the nightmare of grading 120 very poorly written homeworks every four weeks. my students also stopped obsessing about the grades they would receive on their homeworks and instead focused on ~~learning~~ the grades they would receive on their exams

however, at the k-12 level, it feels like a much harder problem to tackle. parental involvement is the only solution i can think of, and that's already kind of a nightmare (at least here in the us)

is the deniability you are referring to of the clanker-wankers (CW^[unrelated, but i miss when that channel had superhero shows. bring back legends of tomorrow]) themselves or the clanker-producers (e.g. sam altman)?

because i agree on the latter^[i.e., someone like altman would say "you're prompting it wrong" to skirt accountability or create an air of scientific/mathematical rigor], but i do see CWs saying stupid shit like "there is more to it than just writing a description"

edit: credit, it was @antifuchs who introduced the term to me here

edit2: sorry, my dumbass understands your point now (i think). if i wank clankers and someone tells me "that shit doesn't work," i can just respond "you must have been prompting it wrong". but, i do think the way many users of these tools are so sycophantic means it's also a genuine belief, and not just a way to escape responsibility. these people are fart sniffers, after all

people who talk about "prompting" like it's a skill would take a class^[read: watch a youtube tutorial] on tasseomancy because a coffee shop opened across the street

This is an excellent sneer, thank you for sharing! <3

Beads.

wish i had thought of this before clearing out my inbox 😞

hackneyed; stale

you seem like the kind of dork whose brain literally explodes when you read this sentence

clanker

edit: this may be used to refer to the chatbots themselves, rather than those who fondle chatbots

holy shit how have i never heard of this paper

thank you for sharing!