Did qobuz by now implement a way to check their catalogue without agreeing to an abo? As far as I know they haven't ...
I won't check them out if they have such shady practices and I wish people would stop recommending them to be honest: that's just predatory to link a trial to a credit card and not give any option to browse the offering even without listening.
Correct - I wanted to compare my Spotify playlists with the alternatives but qobuz wants a credit card before allowing you to check their offer... Won't do that.
Did qobuz by now implement a way to check their catalogue without agreeing to an abo?
I won't switch to a company that obfuscates their offer behind a paywall.
Ich bin bei dir, damit sind wir aber in den Foren in der Minderheit, in meiner Wahrnehmung.
Die meisten Sachen drehen sich um das umdrehen im Supermarkt, um afri cola und um die Konsumgüter - da macht das dann auch Sinn, wenn die Berichterstattung folgt. Eine kritische Erweiterung zur Beobachtung erhoffe ich mir bei der Tagesschau schon lange nicht mehr, leider.
Ahhh ok das war bei mir von Anfang an Out of scope.
Dann trifft meine Antwort mit "geht auf jeden Fall" aber nicht zu, weil mit dem direkt in Steckdose Setup kenne ich mich null aus :D
Edith: habe den OP falsch verstanden. Die Antwort bezieht sich auf volle Setups,keine Balkonpanele. Machbar ist das trotzdem auf jeden Fall wäre aber wahrscheinlich mehr Arbeit.
Technisch kein Problem aber wo kommen die Zahlen her? Also was sind "die" 800w? Ich plane gerade meine Anlage und mein Verbrauch ist hoch, sowohl Grundlast als auch peaks. Alleine dafür lohnt sich ein Speicher bei mir...
Depends on your job and needs.
Sadly, yes. I know several people who found their job on LinkedIn in OPs country for example(sampling warning: because I have close ties to an Austrian company recruiting actively there).
I see the problem similar to the fediverse: for mass attraction you need either mass or a selling point. LinkedIn at least has the numbers...
I'm annoyed by it every time I have to open it but there are too many business ties to just dump for me and I don't have the influence to convince anyone to change communication platforms.
All of that is my profession bubble of course.
Disclaimer: Not Canadian, perhaps I'm projecting :)
Pleas don't mix up uneducated or poor with stupid: without the education necessary and the time to perform a critical cause/effect analysis it's near impossible to do. Only chance is again historic education.
The conservative message is really really easy: "this X is the cause for all your problems!"
And at first glance it's easy to agree: I have a bad job. An immigrant has a better job. Of course they are the cause for me not having a job!
That's the conservatives weapon: they simplify their lies until you need time and effort to see through it - or learn from the past. They make sure that the poor don't have the chance to either and the cycle continues.
Personal note: fuck them. In every country, for every lie for every "policy".
Who would that be in this case?
Do whatever is most comfortable for you :) My opinion!
From your linked article:
"While the term was defined originally to mean "methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to natural scientists", some scholars, as well as political and religious leaders, have also adopted it as a pejorative term with the meaning "an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation"
That "worshipping " wording is, by your own sources, a political act.
Pulling a definition out of your arse and then judging a whole group of people based on your made up beliefs... You're not an anarchist, you're a trumpist in decline, pitching people against each others instead of standing up for others.
I disagree: there are no stupid questions - but there are loaded questions, questions with wrong assumptions baked in or statements with a questionmark attached.
Small difference but I found my life way better when differentiating between "person doesn't know l" and "person wants to be a troll".