Oh dann habe ich das wahrscheinlich auch verdreht, today I learned! Danke :)

Hey das OLG hat hier doch "richtig" geuereilt, sprich: in meinem Sinne gesagt, dass ABP keinen unlauteren Eingriff vornimmt.

Springer ist halt vors BGH gezogen und die haben "Formfehler", zurück auf null und so ...

Edit: der folgende Absatz ist falsch, das LG HH ist das mit den komischen Urteilen, nicht das OLG.

Was ich damit meine: ~~nur weil die anderen 99 Urteile von OLG HH nicht nachvollziehbarer Müll war und es einen Grund gibt, warum alles, was gegen Verbraucher geht in Hamburg eingeklagt wird ist das nicht in 100% der Fälle so.~~

Neither. What you don't seem to understand is neither how physically data gets stored nor how data rescue works.

On your very picture a magnetic disk is visible - that's where the storage is. You don't need the original case, head or even platine.

Now don't get me wrong please: I highly doubt that w complete reconstruction is feasible. Instead what I'm trying to convey is that the amount of data still on a trash heap that you transformed this disk into is for me utterly impressive.

No magnets, no acids - you're right in that this'll be hard - but from what the people told me who did a disc rescue for me once this would not yet be the worst thing they see.

The most interesting party for me is the about of tricks they need to do to reconstruct the data structure, ie where does one file and and the next one start. I'm hindsight an obvious issue but I never thought about that.

If your baseball got exactly the right spots the rescue would become at least easy now expensive :D

Nein. Wir sind mindestens zu zweit.

But this is an American outlet reporting on science..

"""

Earth's pole has drifted toward 64.16°E at a speed of 4.36 cm/yr during 1993–2010 due to groundwater depletion and resulting sea level rise

"""

That was two clicks away - so you're right: the property science wasn't some in fridges or football fields or any of the US scales.

Worked for me, hope the copy paste does as well

Mysterious Antimatter Physics Discovered at the Large Hadron Collider

The LHCb experiment has observed a new difference between matter and antimatter in particles called baryons

By Clara Moskowitz edited by Lee Billings

Baryon particle illustration.

Thomas Parsons/Science Source

Matter and antimatter are like mirror opposites: they are the same in every respect except for their electric charge. Well, almost the same—very occasionally, matter and antimatter behave differently from each other, and when they do, physicists get very excited. Now scientists at the world’s largest particle collider have observed a new class of antimatter particles breaking down at a different rate than their matter counterparts. The discovery is a significant step in physicists’ quest to solve one of the biggest mysteries in the universe: why there is something rather than nothing.

The world around us is made of matter—the stars, planets, people and things that populate our cosmos are composed of atoms that contain only matter, and no antimatter. But it didn’t have to be this way. Our best theories suggest that when the universe was born it had equal amounts of matter and antimatter, and when the two made contact, they annihilated one another. For some reason, a small excess of matter survived and went on to create the physical world. Why? No one knows.

So physicists have been on the hunt for any sign of difference between matter and antimatter, known in the field as a violation of “charge conjugation–parity symmetry,” or CP violation, that could explain why some matter escaped destruction in the early universe.

Today physicists at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)’s LHCb experiment published a paper in the journal Nature announcing that they’ve measured CP violation for the first time in baryons—the class of particles that includes the protons and neutrons inside atoms. Baryons are all built from triplets of even smaller particles called quarks. Previous experiments dating back to 1964 had seen CP violation in meson particles, which unlike baryons are made of a quark-antiquark pair. In the new experiment, scientists observed that baryons made of an up quark, a down quark and one of their more exotic cousins called a beauty quark decay more often than baryons made of the antimatter versions of those same three quarks.

Magnet for the LHCb (large hadron collider beauty) particle detector at CERN (the European particle physics laboratory) near Geneva, Switzerland.

CERN/Science Source

“This is a milestone in the search for CP violation,” says Xueting Yang of Peking University, a member of the LHCb team that analyzed the data behind the measurement. “Since baryons are the building blocks of the everyday things around us, the first observation of CP violation in baryons opens a new window for us to search for hints of new physics.”

The LHCb experiment is the only machine in the world that can summon sufficient energies to make baryons containing beauty quarks. It does this by accelerating protons to nearly the speed of light, then smashing them together in about 200 million collisions every second. As the protons dissolve, the energy of the crash springs new particles into being.

“It is an amazing measurement,” says theoretical physicist Edward Witten of the Institute for Advanced Study, who was not involved in the experiment. "Baryons containing b [beauty] quarks are relatively hard to produce, and CP violation is very delicate and hard to study.”

The 69-foot-long, 6,000-ton LHCb experiment can track all the particles created during the collisions and the many different ways they can break down into smaller particles. “The detector is like a gigantic four-dimensional camera that is able to record the passage of all the particles through it,” says LHCb spokesperson and study co-author Vincenzo Vagnoni of the Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN). “With all this information, we can reconstruct precisely what happened in the initial collision and everything that came out and then decayed.”

The matter-antimatter difference scientists observed in this case is relatively small, and it fits within predictions of the Standard Model of particle physics—the reigning theory of the subatomic realm. This puny amount of CP violation, however, cannot account for the profound asymmetry between matter and antimatter we see throughout space.

“The measurement itself is a great achievement, but the result, to me, is not surprising,” says Jessica Turner, a theoretical physicist at Durham University in England, who was not involved in the research. “The observed CP violation seems to be in line with what has been measured before in the quark sector, and we know that is not enough to produce the observed baryon asymmetry.”

To understand how matter got the upper hand in the early universe, physicists must find new ways that matter and antimatter diverge, most likely via particles that have yet to be seen. “There should be a new class of particles that were present in the early universe, which exhibit a much larger amount of this behavior,” Vagnoni says. “We are trying to find little discrepancies between what we observe and what is predicted by the Standard Model. If we find a discrepancy, then we can pinpoint what is wrong.”

The researchers hope to discover more cracks in the Standard Model as the experiment keeps running. Eventually LHCb should collect about 30 times more data than was used for this analysis, which will allow physicists to search for CP violation in particle decays that are even rarer than the one observed here. So stay tuned for an answer to why anything exists at all.

One could argue they a reading service should not alter the thing that's read. Android is not a quantum state!

Understandable, he was right very often and "only" his tone was....unfiltered. but I ignore the "was right" part when using that phrasing :)

I'd like to imagine that this would be close to the phrasing Linus himself would choose, although I could be off of course!

Take a sentence with 200 characters then.

And your opinion is exactly that and doesnt match security research:

For the following you're not the target group but others reading this who might want to make their lifes easier. Just from your way of writing I at least don't expect that minor sources like okta or the NCSC will change your mind.

( article links with high level descriptions and links to their primary sources)

https://www.okta.com/identity-101/password-vs-passphrase/

https://www.4bis.com/passphrase-vs-complicated-passwords-passphrases-are-best/

https://specopssoft.com/blog/passphrase-best-practice-guide/

I really don't enjoy Linus' content without context I have to admit.

He was an absolute dipshit back then and he's one of the few people I've read about who not only acknowledged that but also put effort into changing it - and succeeded.

Yeah the newer mails are not as funny to third parties anymore but I'm really happy for him and especially the kernel devs around him.

There's a xkcd for that of course! Linking directly to the explain as it has more info but the important thing is: password guidelines tricked humans into thinking in a machine way about safe passwords but long pass phrases are more secure from an entropy point of view and way easier to remember!

https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/936:_Password_Strength