School_Lunch

joined 2 years ago
[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 43 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I remember back when Trump got caught with all those classified docs there was a story about him showing off some about submarines to a rich Australian dude. There was a comment about how everyone in the navy knows that you do not talk about subs. Everything about them is top secret, and if it were anyone else there would be very severe consequences.

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So our economy is going to be based on incorrect info. Every lie incures a debt to the truth, and that debt will eventually come due. Things will crash. Its not even a question. I figure the last protection in place is Powell. Once he is replaced by a yes-man, its all done for. Before that happens I plan on pulling all my investments. My question is where is a safe place to put it at that point?

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 98 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wasn't it a big thing when the white house was first built that they didn't want it to be a palace? They wanted to make it clear that it was not meant for a king.

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago

I don't know what racist town you're from, but that is not reality no matter how much racists wish it was. As for a name for people who take more than anyone could ever deserve, we simply call them billionaires.

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Of course everyone wants to make money. Its about HOW the money is made. If we lived in a meritocracy the way they claim, then you can measure how hard someone works by their wealth, and you're gonna sit there and tell me there are people who work a BILLION times harder than the average person? Get the fuck outa here. Billionaires only exist because they are taking more than they deserve, and its gotta come from somewhere. They are stealing from all of us and devaluing our labor.

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

And if its voluntary I would more likely categorize it as a hobby rather than work. I think we need a better definition for "work". Work, to me, is an obligation. People work in order to feed and house themselves. So let's says someone has $10mil. That is more than enough to easily live off the interest. I would say anyone at that level of wealth never actually works because they have the option to stop at any time, which in my mind makes it a hobby.

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm uninformed, but this seems out of chararcter. Its seems more in chararcter for the current US administration. I'd wonder if they are pushing this in exchange for the military aid?

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bark Ruffalo

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

You might want to check out "The Looming Tower". Its probably over dramaticized, but it follows FBI agent John O'Neil played by Jeff Daniels. It shows how frustrating it was to deal with the Bush administration. O'Neil was fired and went to work security at the WTC and was killed by the attack.

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Only thing I use is the duck duck go browser. The problem is any YouTube links I come across. I'm just not going to click them anymore and I'm not interested enough to try to find a link for YouTube on newpipe. I'm not going to watch random videos like I did before while logged out of YouTube because it wont let me anymore. I'm certainly not going to watch them while logged in because it would screw up the shitty recommendation algorithm even worse.

 

We know pretty well what matter is and how it interacts with the others.

Dark matter interacts through gravity but not light. Beyond that I haven't heard much else.

And lastly anti-matter has an opposite charge and interacts with matter through annihilation. I think I remember hearing that it would react with dark matter the same way.

So my question is, does anti-dark matter exist, and what are it's properties?

6
... (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by School_Lunch@lemmy.world to c/trees@lemmy.world
 

I'll be going on a road trip to Yellowstone with my family and won't be able to smoke. I'm planning on taking a cart with me to hit at night before bed, so I'll be able to sleep. My concern is that I remember hearing when Colorado first legalized weed there were checkpoints on the Wyoming border. It would be packed away in my luggage, so unless there's a dog I'm not really that worried. So I guess my question is does Wyoming have border checkpoints with drug dogs?

view more: next ›