SatanicNotMessianic

joined 2 years ago
[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

I’ve been in the industry for about 30 years now, and I still will break out some command line Perl when I need to regex something.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m from SF and am part of the community. I know and love the sisters! They’re not organized as a religion, though, and California doesn’t have any anti-drag laws anyway. We have mandatory drag shows that you must attend over cocktails and brunch.

I was thinking of something like making drag an official component of worship in TST or something, so it would get more headlines and TST has already established itself as a religion.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I totally agree, but the study I read was pre-Dobbs, I believe. It was a longitudinal study so the data in the study was absolutely pre-Dobbs and went back through the 50s or so. Sorry - it’s been a while and the thing that stuck with me the most was the line graph.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

Same here - that’s why I was surprised by that result for Gen X.

I don’t usually associate conservatives with having more nuanced views, though. Think about all the pushback on diversity programs and CRT. I think that nuanced thought is largely an effect of education, where you learn more facts as well as how to think through problems.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I was not implying otherwise - not intentionally at least. I do think wealth has a lot to do with it. However, there’s also a developing fear of change as people get older (so becoming conservative in the classical sense of the word in terms of not wanting things to change), and if I recall correctly there’s increases in things like religiosity as well. I’m not aware of anyone who looked at the aging effect on things like racism, etc., but I wouldn’t be surprised. My father, who was a Republican, used to say that a conservative was a liberal who’d gotten mugged.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Well, we know that wizards are vulnerable to physical attack and to surprise attacks. There’s the whomping willow, which they can’t just cast a force field against. There were the spiders and the centaurs in the forest. The big three headed dog. That devil’s something plant. And if I recall, Voldemort didn’t realize the caretaker had come into the house until he was in the hallway and Nagini saw him. Sorry, it’s been a hot minute since I read those.

Wizards, one would think, could go flinging cars around whenever they wanted to, but they use death spells, even on muggles. Maybe they think it’s gauche to do something so mundane as dropping a rock on someone’s head, I couldn’t say. Jedi use the Force to throw things, but not to just crush someone’s head or rip it from their body. That would take a lot less force (so to speak) than lifting an X-wing, but they still use lightsabers.

And for what it’s worth, I think a sniper could take out a Jedi, too.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

California already has these laws, and I think Colorado may have passed similar ones. I think it’s a great trend.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 years ago (18 children)

I find this odd. A study came out last year (iirc) that found that, as Americans get older, a greater percentage of each age cohort becomes more conservative. It was particularly interesting because each generation exhibited the trend at the same rate - just offset by the age differences.

However millennials broke the trend, becoming more liberal as they got older, and Gen Z even more so.

I’d have to look at the details of the two studies to come to any conclusions as to what’s driving the different findings.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 years ago (10 children)

I don’t know. I’ve always thought a sniper could have taken out Voldemort. Far away, camouflaged, and the bullet gets there faster than the sound. It’s a reaction time thing.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Yes. I use the term “hard atheist” because in my experience that’s the term that people who aren’t necessarily familiar with atheism get on the first read. I think I first came across it being used by Dennett or one of those guys, but I can’t remember at this point.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That (iirc) Harvard professor specialized in fascism wrote that we cannot count on institutions for protection. We’ve seen that institutions, including the judiciary, can be taken over and corrupted. Trump has stated multiple times that one of his first acts as president will be to basically clear the decks of the federal government and fire all of the non-Trumpist personnel. His lawyer even argued that the president can break any law, up to and including murder, and impeachment is the only process to hold them accountable. I’m not even sure how that’s supposed to work, since then they could arrest or kill everyone in Congress who would support their impeachment.

Basically, we’re fucked.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago (5 children)

That was the nickname they used for Tevye’s daughter Chavala in Fiddler on the Roof.

view more: ‹ prev next ›