SanctimoniousApe

joined 11 months ago

Most inept non-responding "responses" I've seen since Reddit.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There wasn't a need to rebut anything. Your comment confirmed what I asked from the start. Just in a very unpleasant, toxic, angry, way. They're the same thing under a different name.

If you don't see the difference between states taxing for their own operations that benefit its residents, and federal "tariffs" that didn't even have to get approved by Congress to be legal & that get funneled towards things that rarely benefit those paying, then this is pointless.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I honestly haven't wanted to know the details of the whole sordid affair enough to answer that question, although I can't see how that would matter even if what they did was technically legal wherever it was.

No, most of his voters never cared about his character, but a small percentage were more moderate Republicans for whom such things actually do matter (they're true believers in "the conservative way") - possibly just enough to have swayed things.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world -2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'll agree with the last sentence, but where's the ad-hominem? I addressed your "argument" - such as it was, since we are most definitely NOT saying the same things - and said you were ignoring details. YOU, on the other hand, did not rebut what I just said, but jumped to playing the victim. GMAFB.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I've no doubt that's the case (e.g. Clinton's likely in there, for example), although I expect it's a ratio much like then FBI director Wray during Trump's first term testified regarding propensity towards politically-inspired violence: more than twice as likely to be conservatives doing it.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Sales tax is imposed by the states (and sometimes smaller localities) to help fund their operations, not the feds (although the tariffs have effectively amounted to that without actually saying it) - people can move to places like Delaware if they have a problem with that. These tariffs are universal, and since the manufacturing of the bulk of products has been offshored LONG ago, there's no alternative.

Gotta love people like you who deliberately ignore the detailed nuances because it destroys your so-called argument.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The government is a funnel, not an endpoint. Keep following the money. Blows my mind people led around by the nose by the GOP still believe their rhetoric about this - just proves the groupthink and lack of critical thinking going on with their voters.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Maybe in a properly functioning capitalistic system that ensures truly fair competition, prevents monopolies (or near/effective monopolies), and properly manages limited resources (and I'm sure other things that didn't immediately come to mind). Not so much what exists currently.

Considering the major infighting that's been going on the past few weeks, I can't help but disagree. They may have tried sticking together more than they are now for the sake of winning the election, but there might have been just enough friction to sway things if Trump was proven to have been on the list.

As far as protecting donors, they are going to be found out sooner or later anyway - what better way to bury it than by the distraction of it ensnaring a presidential candidate? By the time things got around to them, everybody would be sick of the subject anyway.

Doesn't really matter. The assholes along their enablers and sycophants have done incredible damage to the country in just six months - it's already barely recognizable as the great country it once was, and I've little hope it'll survive another 3.5 years of this disaster. This whole Epstein thing has been the first time there's been any hope of putting an end to the destruction before it's too late - let me fantasize.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I've seen less than a handful of vague indications that was a possibility, while there's numerous credible accusations that have been made against Trump. Maybe get your head out of the cult of blind hatred, and start dealing with some facts?

Ahh... Who am I kidding? You're obviously too committed (or should be - to a mental institution) to face the actual fact that you voted for the true scum of the earth.

I mean - just look at your chosen screen name. Says it all. And before you go there, "ape" is an old usage of the word as a verb meaning "to imitate" - so my name means I'm imitating your sanctimoniousness & feeding it right back at you. Enjoy!

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Did you miss the "roll eyes" emoji? Regardless - Trump's definitely the worse of the two in that department. Biden may have wanted to, but he seems to have (mostly) restrained himself. Trump? Not so much.

ETA: I have not seen a single trustworthy indication that Biden is in the Epstein files.- you're revealing your cult-induced (or worse, deliberate choice of) blindness to the full set of facts and their place in the big picture.

They've been trying to push Celsius energy drinks rather heavily lately. This could go two ways: hurt those efforts, or spread brand awareness far better than their marketing efforts so far (which the cynical side of me wants to suspect might have been the intention, but I have no basis for that gut feeling).

I actually tried a couple flavors a couple months ago, and couldn't stand the taste (but then I don't care for Red Bull, either, so my preferences may be questionable). As such they probably could use all the marketing - intentional or not - that they can get. At least that is the case while operating under the old "no such thing a bad publicity" mindset.

 

Sorry these guys have to put off their retirement, but thank goodness they're willing to.

 

IMHO, the only "hypocrisy" is with the conservative-owned press holding Biden to standards LONG since tossed aside for Trump. The people have made it clear they only respect a government who fights dirty, and WAY effing past time they get what they asked for. In the scheme of things, this is positively mundane - but they'll try to attack anything that Dems do that they'd gleefully make excuses for Trump doing since that pisses off Dems. I congratulate Biden for finally saying "fuck it," and doing the same thing they would do.

 

Republicans: the party of freedom, my farking ass.

 

Frankly, I hope Elon wins this one. His handling of Twitter demonstrates his incompetence, and his inability to keep his mouth shut will be helpful in preparing to fight whatever BS they're up to next. The other guy might be too smart and sneaky considering his involvement in the fake elector scheme.

 

Google's "Voice Access" is decent for controlling the device through verbal commands, but you have to be looking at the screen to get results - it won't read anything back to you.

Google's "TalkBack" will read things on screen to you, but you have to interact with the screen physically (never mind the significant change in how interactions work - which I understand the need for - but it's still a serious mental PITA to switch between the two interaction methodologies frequently).

Is there no way to just interact with it entirely verbally? A (very) simple example of what I'm looking for:

  1. "What are the current Google News headlines?"
  2. Starts reading each one aloud, along with the names of the sources.
  3. "Read the article about Trump caught making out with Elon from AP News."
  4. Proceeds to load the article & read it aloud.

(Yeah, I know there are podcasts for this - it's meant to illustrate the basic idea of completely verbal interaction with the device, not be an actual problem I'm looking for someone to provide a solution to.)

It just seems to me that we should be able to do this by now - especially with all the AI blow-up over the past couple of years. Can anybody point me to a usable solution to accomplish this?

TIA.

EDIT: I thought of a better example (I think), because it occurred to me that the above one could (sort of) be done with a Google Home speaker. I'm looking to be able to interact with Android apps verbally wherever possible, so my better example is "What are the latest posts made to the 'No Stupid Questions' community on Lemmy?" So far as I know, Google Home is not able to do such a thing. I'd like to tell Android to open my Lemmy client and start reading post headlines until it hit one I wanted to have it open & read to me.

I'm basically looking to use apps verbally to fill in gaps that Google Home/Assistant don't cover.

EDIT 2: Here's an even better, more universally applicable description of what I'm after - copied from a response I gave to another comment:

Imagine someone doing some relatively mindless menial job such as working an assembly line, janitorial work, chauffer - something where your mind is relatively unoccupied, but you're not free to look at and/or touch your device (whether it be due to practicality, or job rules). While doing that job, I want to be able to have the device read and interact with something of interest to me at that moment (ADHD is a fickle mistress), rather than just relying on podcasts with predefined content. Kind of like having someone next to me doing all the interfacing between me and the device.

EDIT 3: I added a comment with some news on options that may come close enough to doing the job which I've come across since posting.

 

I've often assumed Harris didn't want to insult her boss by going against him, because I got the impression she was planning to give Netanyahu what for once she took over - especially with him escalating things further and further. Did anyone else get that vibe, or was it just wishful thinking on my part?

 

People are calling for violence against FEMA on TikTok and X, new reports say.

I seriously don't understand why these people aren't immediately tracked down and arrested for terroristic threats. This BS is way beyond any reasonable "free speech" limit.

view more: next ›