SaltSong

joined 1 year ago
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

Also a consideration, yes.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago

Why are they lumping trainspotters in with that crowd?

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I mean, Rowling is a shit, but as far as I know she's never laid hands on anyone. She can cause a lot of harm with hateful words and her significant public exposure, but that's a different kind of thing.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 24 points 10 months ago (4 children)

That would be a planet-eating star, OR a star eating a planet.

Shouldn't journalists be able to construct sentences?

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 10 points 10 months ago

I'm gonna be extra nasty to him.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 4 points 10 months ago

Interesting. Good to know.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago

Ah, interesting. Good to know.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Interesting.

Not the answer I'm looking for, but still interesting. Thanks for the information!

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 9 points 10 months ago (12 children)

So, a moment of curiosity.

If my theoretical pistol did get pulled into am MRI machine, stuck against it by the magnet, and I, for the purpose of scientific inquiry, pulled the trigger, should I expect the bullet to fire more or less as normal, to fire, but the bullet be pulled back to the machine, or for the bullet to not move, or not move more than an inch or so from the barrel?

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago

Ah, I see. You are thinking about the properly structured flowchart, not the humorously true one.

Yea, fair enough.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 4 points 10 months ago

chasing the dragon

Huh. I guess it might be.

Far from my first game, but my first perfect game. Yea, I guess that does track.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Not a sequel. Just because it's not Portal 1. The fact that it's second is not the problem. The problem is that the first one was flawless.

view more: ‹ prev next ›