SaltSong

That seems incredibly unlikely.

Once again, I long for precidented times.

I didn't say otherwise.

I have no comment on weather the Korean War was a genocide. I don't know enough about the topic.

Your statement, that I replied to, was "Nothing in the community rule say that the content should be about established facts"

If I didn't remember, then it would be not meaningfully different from the life I live now.

That is what I understand. But that is not meaningful in this case. Speaking purely hypothetically, there is no reason that the US could not take advantage of North Korean aggression as an excuse to commit the genocide that the article accuses them of.

Should we be learning things that aren't true?

But the media is going to split coverage. There will be very direct comparisons of crowd sizes. Some people will have to decide which event to attend, as they can't attend both.

And in both cases, missing the point. Categorize based on the chemistry, not the source of the chemical.

That would kind of miss the whole point.

That's an untenable position. I mean, Cocaine is a plant, too.

I mean we as a group. Some of us will, but they will be decried by the rest of us. Too much, too far, too soon.

If we could all get on the same page, that would be one thing. But it's like unions, isn't it? Once man stopping work is just quitting. The whole factory stopping work is industrial action.

Plenty of countries sign on to nuclear non proliferation.

Besides, the Federation did well enough without it.