That is what I understand. But that is not meaningful in this case. Speaking purely hypothetically, there is no reason that the US could not take advantage of North Korean aggression as an excuse to commit the genocide that the article accuses them of.
SaltSong
joined 8 months ago
Should we be learning things that aren't true?
But the media is going to split coverage. There will be very direct comparisons of crowd sizes. Some people will have to decide which event to attend, as they can't attend both.
And in both cases, missing the point. Categorize based on the chemistry, not the source of the chemical.
That would kind of miss the whole point.
That's an untenable position. I mean, Cocaine is a plant, too.
I mean we as a group. Some of us will, but they will be decried by the rest of us. Too much, too far, too soon.
If we could all get on the same page, that would be one thing. But it's like unions, isn't it? Once man stopping work is just quitting. The whole factory stopping work is industrial action.
Plenty of countries sign on to nuclear non proliferation.
Besides, the Federation did well enough without it.
Mark Hamil did that once in Batman.
Your last point is wrong, at least as you have stated it. Evaporation time is based on surface area, and the required power is based on volume, but you expressed the amount of water as a length.
Still, metric is way better.
If I didn't remember, then it would be not meaningfully different from the life I live now.