Yeah, no. They have 70 different systems and what you're talking about is the Mediterranean diet.
Sagifurius
joined 2 years ago
What a mystery this is
This just seems weird. it's a "study" but it's just some guys making a list of hurricanes that exceeded 192 mph winds and saying "these should be in their own category", and I'm assuming they didn't pick 200 mph because the list would then be too small. They're also ignoring historic hurricanes that hit that, https://hurricanescience.org/history/storms/1930s/LaborDay/
I've collected most of that except the bike in the last 5 years, grew tired of new stuff failing and being mostly disposable. The can opener is really neat, seems like 110 years ago they knew how to make something that actually worked and opened cans without leaving sharp edges, much better built than what you get at a store today. theyre 10 bucks on ebay. https://www.ebay.ca/itm/335171281718?hash=item4e09c3e336:g:7LIAAOSwPrFlZofk&amdata=enc%3AAQAIAAAA0Exx8HDDFCXcyRYMrVHWpfpb4KkPCs685zBXJr%2FZxP3vXqGhnb8Gz0hHopfDa%2BvUWB9Ul925P1z9C20IVf%2FMQyeN2cM75RwAQg4AMY8FoGc5XXor6AwQgO4mNJjIprA0RHqrSpsqQjSOkugWUJ5oAFiKYhwjMUJrROWGaksLXdLCuFHpVPzolYKOTB5dEPW7uTRpUULrD0YXtrKGZktbDCaKSCA%2F59wj2sh0FiXtT2OTNhFVaTllTptmBt57QcY9NSySvgwxX63NDsK9Xg47wEY%3D%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR4iR0YGwYw
Use survivorship bias in your favour. I've a fridge from 1953, wonderful 60s gas stove, a can opener from 1915, pickup from 1983, motorcycle from 1969 etc.
Trying to get kicked in the head apparently
They reverse it in England, 4x2s
Hopefully the guy appeals, the judge seems to using some tortured logic to take the governments side, claiming it's illegal for citizens to criticize politicians statements made in parliament, and that the politician would be oppressed by the citizens being able to defend himself with what the politician literally said. I'm Canadian, not Australian, and that would absolutely not fly here, parliamentary privilege is mostly to keep them from suing each other for defamation,
That's not normally how it works. A politician can't get sued for something he says in parliament, but I've never heard of the record of what he said being inadmissible before.
How did he do that when he was in university in Ontario?
oh. Vox. that's definitive.