SSUPII

I own an alt on sdf. It might have successfully federated the image by me accessing my posts via web on sdf to help federation.

This issue seems strictly about trying to federate via mobile apps.

There are currently issues on this instance

Yeah. The API got placed behind an anti-bot system. I also cannot load my own image posts on Summit.

Seems to be partial. Reading text works, image loading fails on seemingly random images (including the one in this post, cache misses?) with

Failed to create image decoder with message 'unimplemented'Input contained an error.

Sending this comment worked.

Uploading images works, but they cannot be seen.

Making new posts will always provide the suggested title "Make sure you are not a bot!"

Makes finding the generator and manual so much more important

At the moment, sopuli.xyz has been entirely placed under Anubis, including the API (https://sopuli.xyz/post/31275306)

Is there a possibility for the frontend to pass Anubis checks, or make the error more descriptive?

Yeah. I can no longer use the instance on Summit now.

The meds, take them

When you login to a service using Google you are asked if you consent to a list of information you are going to share from your account. If phone number is not mentioned, they are not going to. They would have been absolutely demolished by Europe if it was not the case.

You can always make a Claude account from basic email. You don't need specifically Google account to use Claude.

Also, you can have multiple Google accounts verified on a phone number. You can only have one Claude account per phone number.

If the ad is under a filtered domain, it will simply not load. If the ad is under the same domain as the site you are using (ex. Youtube) they will load just fine.

When the primary DNS is down, the secondary DNS will be used. This is the same regardless if PiHole is used or not, but is how DNS works.

Comment OP provided zero sources. This could be an online form where people can lie and say they are the other gender to feel better about themselves. Removing the chance of lying who got questioned could have also interpreted "heavier" as "fatter", not generally "bulkier".

Or they could be made up or have atrocious sample sizes and selection, as per usual with general polls.

Absolutely, I would never doubt it (as anybody should from a picture alone).

I noticed that a good chunk of many that like to single out people and relations based on size they also think anything different than a stick is unhealthy and only "who is in the league" would consider it. It is just something not grounded in reality, and everyone will like what they want.

I don't get the reason for posting all these magic numbers with no source, especially since it is about preference of something that is considered a "taboo" and many will refuse to properly state them, under a completely unrelevant post. So even if there is a source for these, both if the poll is in person or online, they are very unreliable.

Not to deny the minority that are people that highly prefer a fat person/partner, especially since I am both one and prefer one. I am not here to conquer every single person that sees me even if I was the complete opposite and be jacked, because that is simply unrealistic.

I am myself, with my personality and a body I feel comfortable in.