There's enough front page politics right now about conservatives all being and protecting child rapists, that I missed the title as "MAGA launches file host with no limits"
SCmSTR
joined 2 years ago
Looked it up, and molestation apparently just involves touching, whereas rape involves intercourse. So it might be more accurate to say, "bunch of child rapists". But even then, that probably doesn't cover kidnapping, trafficking, abuse, drugging, and repeatedly raping a bunch of children for decades in a personal billionaire cult ring on a private island.
Every person defending these monsters deserves to be alive in the most , , and public way. I am calling for absolute of the highest degree.
I wanna hear that in a condescending satire waltz opera
Dude, fuck ALL reddit. That place is worse than Twitter, now.
I basically agree with all but the coworkers not friends thing. You spend a fuckton of basically everyday with these people - you need to make it not a living hell for everybody, and the only people who ever say this shit are the most hostile, passive aggressive, self centered, backstabbing, anti-competitive, two-faced people you'll ever meet.
Like sure you don't have to give each oral and have lunch together, but, christ, don't be such cutthroat selfish pricks to each other, that's what the billionaires want.
Joke's on you: All sports at basically all levels are a rich person's game.
Luck is just the culmination of one's self-compounding privilege.
It's like nuance here is fucking dead and people only understand absolutes, jesus christ.
Let me put it this way: had he not resigned, he would be an even bigger piece of shit.
Holy sexist knee jerk reaction, Batman.
It's shitty of them, especially him. But, at least he has the decency and shame left to step down after this.
Nuance is everything, exactly.
I think when it comes down to it though (and I do often think about this), is what the goal for the future is. Like do we want to just freeze everything as it is? Or live in some techno-futurism "utopia"? Or something else?
How far do we want to take "understanding our world and our risks" before enacting our vision?
I think one of the main problems in society, right now, is that philosophically, not only are we not aligned in our deeply detailed goals, not only do we not know each other's goals, but we hardly know our own goals.
It's something I think we as people living in society need to refocus on and discuss, openly. It's a hell of a time in history to bring up this sort of idealistic conflict, but if not now, then when? There are so many things pulling at our needs for resources and individual attentions, it's a marvel we've even gotten this far.
Honestly, the biggest problems in the world right now are attaining power to even enact said goals of focused discussion of philosophy, because the powers that be seem hell bent on society at large avoiding that at all costs.
Do you have a more detailed and accurate infographic? I'd love to have one.
Edit: I've seen the unicorn one here and searched around and found a few others on https://lgbtqia.fandom.com/wiki/Identity_diagrams
Though, I feel like years ago I saw one that had more dimensions and possibly had accounted for genderfluid people. Also, I don't like that these all include sex assigned at birth, that seems shitty.